Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance - Paternity - Blood group test - When to be ordered - Enumerated...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Paternity - Dispute as to - Party disputing the paternity to prove non-access in order to dispel the presumption - `Access' and `non-access' mean the existence or non existence of opportunities for sexual intercourse; it does not mean `actual cohabitation'...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Second wife, whose marriage is void on account of the survival of first marriage is not entitled to maintenance Burden of proof is on the husband regarding subsistence of legal and valid marriage - Insurance policy where nominae is the first wife and the family identity card issued by Road Transport Corporation, are not..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 126, 127, 128 -- Arrears of maintenance - Claim of maintenance whether stands satisfied on husband being sent to jail - Held. No - Liability can be satisfied only on actual payment of arrears...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125(b), 125(c) -- Illegitimate child is entitled to maintenance...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance - Marriage of a Hindu woman with a Hindu male who had a living spouse - Marriage is null and void - Not entitled to maintenance...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance- Quantum - Change of circumstances - Amount of compensation can be revised after efflux of time...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 397 -- Maintenance granted - Revision by wife for enhancement - Sessions Judge reversed the finding of Magistrate and dismissed the application for maintenance-order challenged by wife before High Court by a revision - Revision is maintainable and not barred by S.397(3)...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, 397 -- Finding on disputed question of fact were recorded by Magistrate after a full consideration of evidence - No error discovered in his judgment - Revisional Court not justified in making a reassessment of evidence and substitute its own views for those of the Magistrate...........