LawMirror.com

Results of default

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1191-1200 of 2047 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay of three years - Condonation of delay - Mistake of clerk of counsel as he could not mark the case and counsel could not appear and case was dismissed for want of prosecution - Factum of dismissal came into notice of applicant on inspection of..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256 -- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Setting aside - One singular default on the part of complainant on record - Sufficient cause for absence shown by complainant - Held, at least one more opportunity should have been given to complainant - Impugned order of dismissal in default set aside - Complaint restored...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135(1)(b) -- Theft of electricity - Loss was assessed at Rs.54,331 - 1st appellant has already paid demanded amount of Rs.54,000/- to the electricity board - He does not have any bad antecedent - He is now aged about 65 years - Held, substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed by trial Court is set aside, instead, he is sentenced to pay a..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 4, 7, Order 9, Rule 3, 4 - - Eviction application - Both parties absent - Dismissal of eviction application for default - Restoration of - Issuance of notice to defendant - Not necessary - Held, O.9.R.3 of CPC provides that where neither party appears, Court may dismiss suit - However in such situation it is not necessary to issue notice..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9 -- Absence of party on date of hearing - Procedure to be followed - Applicability of R.2 & 3 of O.17 - Held, Rr.2 & 3 provides for distinct and different sets of circumstances - U/R.2, Court is empowered to dispose of suit in any one of the modes specified U.O.9.R.2 only when any of the..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 15, Rule 5 -- Striking off defence - U.O.15.R.5(2) CPC the intention of the tenant to pay the rent and other dues have to be taken into account - In the instant case, it can very safely be held that the defendant-revisionist has no intention to commit default in payment of rent, etc. - Revisionist entitled to decision of Court not to..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Banking service - Loan recovery - Availment of loan not denied by the complainant - The default in repayment is also not denied - Neither the legal notice issued on behalf of the Bank nor non - acceptance of the complainant's request to suspend the recovery against the balance of loan amount can be considered a deficiency..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Banking service - Loan recovery - Availment of loan not denied by the complainant - The default in repayment is also not denied - Neither the legal notice issued on behalf of the Bank nor non-acceptance of the complainant's request to suspend the recovery against the balance of loan amount can be considered a deficiency in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20 -- Default sentence - Reduction of - Appellant stands convicted u/s 20 of NDPS Act, 1985 and has been sentenced by High Court to undergo imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years - As of today..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b) -- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the application for restoration filed..........

Showing : 1191-1200 of 2047 Results