Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 313 -- Rape - Quashing of proceedings - Delay of more than 5 years in registering FIR - Complainant revealed that she and appellant lived for a long period as husband and wife - No material on record as per FIR and facts and circumstances of case that complainant had given her consent for sexual relationship with appellant under..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 -- Murder - Deceased died due to injuries sustained by firing of bullet - PW1 and PW2 clearly demonstrated in their deposition that accused were having weapons and on exhortation by other accused, appellant shot the deceased - Source of light in the scene of crime was explained by PW2 in his evidence - Evidence of PW3 proved that..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366, 376 -- Kidnapping and rape - Victim was recovered by police from the house of accused as per PW1 and PW2 - However, I.O. stated that victim was recovered near Railway station - No plausible explanation given for inordinate delay either in FIR or in evidence of witnesses - Main witness who is brother of victim was not examined during..........
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4 -- Offence u/s 4 of the Act - Evidence of victim and that of her mother are incompatible - Doctor who examined the victim girl has specifically stated that she did not find any injury external or internal - Hymen was intact and the Doctor has opined that there was no penetration at the time of occurrence - In..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 447, 427, 294, 506, 34, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Offence u/ss 447, 427, 294, 506, 34 IPC - Quashing of FIR - Complainant was not sure about the date of commission of alleged offences - No reason given for delay of 39 days in lodging FIR - Allegation levelled by complainant that accused demolished the boundary wall..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 506 -- Sexual assault - Delay of seven days in lodging FIR - After commission of offence victim used to remain depressed - Accused had extended threats to kill victim and her parents in case she confided the matter to anyone - As..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376D, 452 -- Rape - Delay of 60 days in lodging FIR - No documentary evidence has been produced to prove the age of victim - No external or internal injury found on the body of victim as per medical record - Testimony of PW1 and PW2 cannot be termed to be wholly reliable - Even, testimony of victim cannot be treated as that of a sterling..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154 -- Delay in lodging FIR - Sexual assault - Delay was explained by mother of victim stating that FIR was lodged after 7 days in view of security and dignity of her daughter - Explanation is sufficient in terms of legislation of POCSO Act to protect the menus of victim after sexual assault - Delay of 7 days in lodging FIR not fatal..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Quashing of proceedings - A delay in FIR by itself will not be a ground to quash the proceedings...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324 -- Offence u/s 324 IPC - Accused had given the dhariya blow on the head of PW6, which was a sharp cutting weapon which was recovered from accused - Endorsement by doctor in the history that injury was caused by accused as well as other witnesses testified on the particular date and time on the PW6 attack was made by Dhariya as well as..........
