LawMirror.com

Results of ejectment+india

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 81-90 of 795 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii) -- Ejectment - Unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Landlord sought ejectment on ground that premises in question had been rendered unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Building expert deposed that flooring of building was not in a workable condition - Balas supporting roof had started decaying - Walls..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13 -- Ejectment - Personal necessity - Landlord sought eviction of tenant on ground of personal necessity to expand his business - Some of the tenants had already vacated portion in their occupation - Landlord wanted to renovate entire building and run his business in same - Held, landlord is the best judge qua his..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106 -- Notice - Relationship of landlord and tenant admitted - Held, service of summons in suit for ejectment can always be treated as a valid notice for terminating tenancy u/s 106 of the Act...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(i), Power of Attorney Act, 1882, Section 1A, 2 -- Ejectment suit through power of attorney holder - Landlord permitted to examine himself as witness, although, his attorney had been examined - Held, no illegality in impugned order - Petitioner/tenant will get an opportunity to cross-examine him - Petition..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 -- Ejectment - Lease agreement - Tenant had taken disputed premises as far back as in February, 1981 at the then rent of Rs.2,091/- per month for a period of three years with right of renewal of lease for a further period of three years on enhancement of rent by 15% over last paid rent - Tenant continued in occupation of premises for 32 years..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i) -- Ejectment - Co-owners of property - Partition - Held, a tenant inducted by one of the co-owners cannot be defeated in his statutory right of protection under the Act of 1949 by an allotment in partition to other co-sharers of property so long as lease itself was not collusive or in excess of authority of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, Section 4(1), 5(1), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Unauthorized occupants - Ejectment - Allotment of booth by Municipal Corporation - Allottee failed to pay installments - Show-cause notice u/s.4(1) of the Act of 1971 served upon him - Eviction order passed under S.5(1) - Petitioner (tenant of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Rent and Eviction -- Ejectment - Agreement of tenancy between parties provided for an adjudication by arbitral process - Plea that lease period has expired and, therefore, agreement cannot be relied on for reference to arbitration - Held, plea liable to be rejected - Arbitral agreement was to resolve any dispute and consequently whether tenant BSNL has a right to continue..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Haryana Public Premises (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972, Section 5, 7, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - - Unauthorized occupants - Petitioners are in unauthorized possession over land which belongs to State of Haryana - They knew very well that they are in authorized possession but instead of accepting this fact they contested application with tooth and..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g), 7, 11 -- Ejectment - As per revenue record Gram Panchayat was owner of `Banjar Qadim' land and petitioners were in forcible possession - Petitioners failed to prove any of conditions to exclude ownership of Gram Panchayat from disputed land - Held, such land would be deemed to have been vested in Gram..........

Showing : 81-90 of 795 Results