Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67 -- Affidavit - Notary before whom sworn not examined - Not a proof in accordance with law - No reliance can be placed thereon...........
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Conviction not to be based merely on the basis of statement u/s 67 of the Act without any independent corroboration particularly in view of the fact that such statements have been retracted - Confessional statement of a co-accused could not be used as substantive evidence against the co-accused...........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67 -- Inquest report - Proof of - Held, mere marking of exhibit and proving signature of witness on inquest report, its contents, would not become admissible in evidence...........
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67, 21 -- Heroin - Recovery of 75 kg. - Accused convicted on the basis of confession made to Officer of Narcotic Control Bureau - Confessional statements recorded by such officers is admissible in evidence - Statement can be considered voluntary if not retracted at the earliest point of time...........
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67 -- Confession made to Officer of Narcotic Control Bureau - Confession is admissible in evidence - Statement can be used as substantive evidence against co-accused...........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 67 -- Document - Proof of execution - Mere production of documents purporting to have been signed or written by a person is no evidence of its authorship - It is necessary to prove its genuineness and execution - Proof has to be given of the hand writing, signature and execution...........
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25 -- Contraband - Confessional statement made before Inspector of Narcotics Bureau - Confession is admissible as Inspector of Narcotics Bureau is not a Police Officer within meaning of S.25 of Evidence Act though he is vested with powers of Police Officer u/s 53 of NDPS Act -..........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67 -- Fax message received in PCO - Illegible copy - Contents not proved - Fax when received and from whom received not proved - Not shown that it was obtained by the person for whom it was meant - Held, fax message not admissible in evidence in terms of S.67 of the Act...........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67, 114, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27 -- Service of notice - Proof - Onus to prove - Notice sent through registered cover - Returned with endorsement/report 'unclaimed' - Report of postman is in discharge of his official duties - Report carries presumption of correctness - Postman not required to be examined to prove the endorsement -..........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67 -- Proof of document - Notice sent through registered post - `Endorsement' of postman that notice has not been claimed - Not an execution of document - Not comparable to proof of execution of a document - Contention that Postman required to be examined to prove the endorsement - Misconceived...........
