LawMirror.com

Results of expert+commission

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 1255 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Handwriting and fingerprint expert - Petitioner was granted numerous opportunities including last and final opportunities, but failed to conclude his evidence - Consequently, his evidence was closed by Court and said order was never challenged by petitioner before any Court - Same amounts to waiver of right - Therefore, subsequent..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Expert opinion - Opinion of an expert including a medical board, is not binding on Court, but is merely advisory in nature - While expert opinions are relevant and may assist Court but Court retains responsibility of framing its independent judgment based on evidence available on record...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Expert opinion - Comparison of signatures - Contemporaneous signatures - Application for comparison of signatures dismissed on the ground that documents containing admitted signatures were not contemporaneous documents - However, High Court has not made any observation with respect to whether document is contemporaneous or not, nor that..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Material alterations - Application for expert opinion was allowed but accused failed to comply with conditions and cheque was not sent for examination - Having neglected that opportunity, accused may not raise material alteration now...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Expert opinion - Comparison of signatures on cheque - Cheques in question were not issued by petitioner - Question of sending cheques for comparison cannot be allowed, as same belong to third party - Application rightly dismissed...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Second handwriting expert - Report of Forensic Expert on record and not set aside - Application dismissed by holding that there is no necessity to send signatures for comparison to another Forensic Expert - Order upheld...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Local Commissioner - Suit for recovery of money for damages - Damages fastened on defendants on the ground that their omissions and commissions have caused damages to building of plaintiff rendering the same uninhabitable - Said finding is based upon report of an expert, prepared and issued by a private..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 483, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 21, 29 -- Bail - Contraband - 11 bottles of codeine were recovered from bedroom of petitioner - Executive Magistrate has categorically stated that he did not accompany raiding party and he only sealed samples which were brought to his office by police -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 18, Rule 3 -- Rebuttal evidence - Plaintiff closed his initial evidence - There is no statement of plaintiff closing his evidence - Plaintiff in rebuttal evidence was allowed to examine handwriting expert - Plaintiff got receipt examined from handwriting expert - Now he is required to prove the same - Such evidence could be..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction - Concurrent findings of Courts below that plaintiff failed to prove encroachment or interference by defendants - Demarcation report and expert witnesses confirmed that both the parties were in possession of their respective Khasra numbers disproving plaintiff's case of..........

Showing : 11-20 of 1255 Results