LawMirror.com

Results of furnish security

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 64 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1999
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 3 -- Conditional leave to defend - Defendant employed as an Engineer Trainee with the plaintiff - Plaintiff was to serve for a period of two years after the completion of probation period - Defendant in default was liable to pay liquidated damages and also the salary for at least 3 years on the basis of last drawn salary -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1998
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 6(2), 5 -- Stay of sale of property attached in execution proceedings - No concept of automatic stay of sale of property in execution - Provisions of Rule 6(1) and 6(2) proceed on the premise that sufficient cause should be shown to Court and then alone Court would exercise discretion - Mere fact that judgment-debtor unable to pay..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1998
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5, 6 -- Stringent provisions exercised by Court when applicant able to make out a prima facie case on the one hand and on the other hand able to satisfy the ingredients under these provisions - Order 38 Rule 5 postulates different orders - Not necessary that Court must straight away pass order of attachment before judgment -..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 88 -- Accused appeared in pursuance to the summons - There is no need to call upon the accused to furnish security for his enlargement...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5 -- Attachment before judgment - Conditional order passed for furnishing security and on failure to effect attachment - Time not fixed for furnishing security - Absence of party when bailiff went to spot - Conclusion as to failure to furnish security - Not justified as no opportunity given for the same - Held, attachment is void...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5 -- Court must apply its mind whether it would require the defendant to furnish security within the directed period or whether the Court would like to issue notice to show cause why the defendant should not furnish such security...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1995
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1(3), 5(5) -- Failure to make deposit or to furnish security - Court not to grant stay of execution of money decree...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Electricity -- Arbitration - Putting petitioner to terms regarding payment of impugned bill till adjudication by the Arbitrator - Prima facie, the petitioner appears to have been tampering with the meter resulting in recording lesser units of electricity which amounts to theft of electricity - Revised bill of above Rs.2 Crore - Petitioner directed to pay Rs.25 lakhs in..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5, 6 -- Attachment before judgment - Security - Defendant can furnish third party security...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5 -- Attachment before judgment - Order not complying with the provisions is void - An attachment order unaccompanied by an order directing the defendant to furnish security within a specified period or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security - Order is a nullity - It is not a curable irregularity...........

Showing : 41-50 of 64 Results