LawMirror.com

Results of land+acquisition+act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 3131-3140 of 9101 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, Section 77(3)(N) -- Bar of jurisdiction - Suit for recovery as compensation for illegal use and occupation of land - Bar of jurisdiction of Civil Court neither pressed before Trial Court nor argued before lower appellate Court - Suit decreed after it remained pending in Civil Court for 7 years - Held, if defendant had pressed issue of jurisdiction..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 3(b), 18, 50 -- `Person interested' - Meaning - Land acquired at the instance of DDA - Held, DDA would be termed as `person interested' within meaning of S.3(b) of the Act - Hence entitled to participate in proceedings before Land Acquisition Collector and also entitled to notice and opportunity to lead evidence before Reference Court -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 3(aa) -- 'Local Authority' - Includes Delhi Development Authority...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6 -- Acquisition of land - Compensation - Deduction of development cost - To be made only where value of a small residential/commercial/industrial plot of land in a developed layout is made the basis for arriving at the market value of a nearly large tract of undeveloped agricultural land and not when acquired land and land of sale..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6 -- Acquisition of land - Compensation - More than one sale deeds of similar lands - Usually the highest to be considered - However, when several sales of similar lands whose price range in a narrow bandwidth, the average thereof can be taken - When price of two sales is markedly different, it lead to an inference that they are with..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 2, Rule 2 -- Amendment of plaint - Permissibility - Suit for permanent injunction to put restraint on defendant from alienating suit land in face of agreement to sell allegedly executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff - Plaintiff by way of proposed amendment, sought to seek relief..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Electricity supply -- Tube well connection - Electricity Tariff - Connection given in 1996 under Drip Irrigation Scheme on priority basis well before the issuance of Sales Circular No.13/97 - No document referred to or other piece of evidence to support the contention that the complainant regarding more than 50% of the land being used for agricultural crop - Perusal of..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Electricity supply -- Tube well connection - Electricity Tariff - Connection given in 1996 under Drip Irrigation Scheme on priority basis well before the issuance of Sales Circular No.13/97 - No document referred to or other piece of evidence to support the contention that the complainant regarding more than 50% of the land being used for agricultural crop - Perusal of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 58 -- Attachment of property - Objection - Sale deed of plot in question was executed in favour of petitioner - Before execution of sale deed, mother of plot owner filed suit for maintenance against her sons and sought charge upon agricultural land of sons which consisted of several plots - Ex parte decree passed in her favour and..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1 -- Suit for partition - Material on record indicated place in which possession of disputed land was declared in favour of defendant No.1 by Magistrate - Sessions Judge reversed order of Magistrate and order was further challenged by way of revision in High Court - A compromise was effected in..........

Showing : 3131-3140 of 9101 Results