LawMirror.com

Results of limitation+for+declaration+suit+

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 3801-3810 of 5052 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Applicability of the provision - Conditions to be satisfied are : (1) Both the prior and subsequent proceedings are civil proceedings prosecuted by the same party; (2) the prior proceeding had been prosecuted with due diligence and good faith; (3) the failure of the prior proceeding was due to defect of jurisdiction or other cause of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- `Good faith' - Means `exercise of due care and attention'...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- `Defect of jurisdiction' - Defect must be of such a character as to make it impossible for the Court to entertain the suit or application and to decide it on merits - Provision does not apply when suit is dismissed after adjudication on its merits and not because the Court was unable to entertain it...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- `Good faith' - Finding as to - The finding as to good faith or the absence of it is a finding of fact...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, 2 -- Exclusion of time - Non joinder of necessary parties - Objection taken at initial stage - Despite that suit proceeded without impleading necessary parties - It cannot be said that plaintiff acted in good faith taking due care and attention hence not entitled to benefit of S.14 of..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Housing - Allotment of the house took place in 1982 - Legal notice served in the year 1991 - Complaint filed in the year 2002 - Complaint entertained by the Commission on the ground that the matter remained under investigation - Complainant was called for recording his statement in connection with the enquiry -..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Appeal -- Right of one appeal - Should always be available to a litigant especially when delay not extraordinary and satisfactory explanation tendered - Limitation Act, Section 5...........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Period of 30 days for filing appeal - Pronouncement of order in the presence of appellant - Contradiction between recording of presence in certified copy of order as well as interlocutory order - Appellant must have acquired knowledge of order when received a notice calling upon him to deposit deficit amount - Limitation for filing appeal..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Liberal approach has to be followed - Court should not proceed with the tendency of finding fault with the cause shown and reject the petition - Acceptance of explanation furnished should be the rule and refusal an exception...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468 -- Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, Sections 3(i) and 10 - Cognizance of offences - Limitation - Quashing of FIR - FIR registered on 8.11.1983 for violation of provisions of Clause (i) of Section 3 of the 1975 Act - Challan submitted on 11.11.1986 - Delay not explained - Continuation of proceedings..........

Showing : 3801-3810 of 5052 Results