LawMirror.com

Results of o 17

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 181-190 of 196 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1988
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Evidence at own responsibility - Revenue Patwari - summoned through Court - official witness cannot be ordered to be produced at own responsibility and it is the duty of the Court to ensure presence of the official witness-order of trial Court closing the evidence on failure to..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1987
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 35B, 96, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Failing to produce evidence and to pay costs - Evidence closed under order 17 rule 3 - does not amount to ex parte decree - application under order 9 rule 13 is not maintainable - remedy lies in appeal u/s 96 CPC...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1987
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3, 2 -- Evidence closed as three official witnesses failing to appear inspite of service of summons - Whether proper ? (No.)..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1987
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 16, Rule 1, 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Process fee and diet money deposited for summoning witnesses - Witnesses served but sought adjournment - Evidence cannot be closed - Party not responsible for no, appearance of witnesses - Court if of opinion that ground of adjournment stated by witnesses a mere excuse - Can..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1976
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, 2(2), Order 17, Rule 3 -- Suit dismissed for default in payment of adjourned costs - Appeal lies...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Applicability - A case in which the defendant obtains an adjournment on the date of final hearing of the suit and fails to appear on the adjourned date would be covered by O.17.R.2 and an application U/O.9.R.13 will lie, even if the Court professes to act U/O.17.R.3. Rule 3..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Open to court to proceed U.O.17.R.3 in the absence of a party where the conditions laid down in the said rule are fulfilled and it appears just and proper to do so - Power of appellate court...........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Decree U.O. 17.R3 - Appeal is competent...........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 3 -- Adjournment costs - Should be reasonable and must not be by way of penalty...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1975
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Decree passed U/O.17.R.2 - Remedy lies in appeal and not U/O.9.R.13 CPC...........

Showing : 181-190 of 196 Results