Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e) -– FDRs - Maturity amount - No, payment of - Deposits were accepted with a promise to pay interest @ 14% p.a. - The normal rate of interest payable by the bank could be around 9 to 12% p.a. - The depositors were allured by the OP No. 1 on the promise to pay more interest - There are various proceedings going on between..........
Airlines -- Overbooking of ticket - The Complainant could not board the said flight in spite of her confirmed ticket - The complainant had to reschedule her journey and had to go through lot of mental agony and physical harassment - Offering of a complementary ticket to the complainant by the appellant/OP proved that they admitted their deficient act and that was why, to..........
Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Peril caused to the turbine generator of Unit-1 of the thermal plant installed by complainant - Insurance cover was comprehensive for 51 months and was available until the occurrence of either of the two situations, namely, the commissioning of the project or 51 months, whichever happened earlier - The Insurance company cannot be permitted..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Insurance claim - Subrogation - From the pleading as well as the documents brought on record, the complainant have not been able to establish that there was any willful or deliberate negligence on the part of the OP in carrying out the operation, which ultimately led to the buckling of the crane boom and..........
Insurance claim -- Subrogation - Letter of subrogation - The insurance policy designated the IDRBT as the `Insured' and HECL as the `Contractor' - It is the insured IDRBT which alone could have executed the letter of subrogation in favour of Insurance Company - In this case the `Insured' IDRBT has merely written a letter to the Insurance Company to the effect that the..........
Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Surveyors' report - Adverse inference - Fire in paper mill - Alleged loss of raw materials - Lone affidavit of the Managing Director - Affidavit of the Supervisor and Security Guard who noticed the fire and were eye witnesses not filed - The reports of the two investigator who were appointed by OP - Insurance Company who had given report..........
Insurance claim -- Repudiation - Surveyors' report - Adverse inference - Fire in paper mill - Alleged loss of raw materials - Lone affidavit of the Managing Director - Affidavit of the Supervisor and Security Guard who noticed the fire and were eye witnesses not filed - The reports of the two investigator who were appointed by OP - Insurance Company who had given report..........
Education -- Admission - Fee refund - Admission for course 2005-2006 in OP No.1 Institute which failed to issue registration card and also did not provide hostel mess facility - Further discovered by the respondent-complainant that the Institute had neither any affiliation nor recommendation of any University or Government - Petitioner who is District Employment Officer..........
Banking service -- Education loan - Default in payment - Publishing name in chronic defaulter list - The complainant having been a defaulter and having violated the terms of loan agreement cannot question the publication of defaulters list by the OP-Bank - The statement of the account of the complainant speaks volumes of his negligence in allowing the loan amount pouring..........
Banking service -- Education loan - Default in payment - Publishing name in chronic defaulter list - The complainant having been a defaulter and having violated the terms of loan agreement cannot question the publication of defaulters list by the OP - Bank - The statement of the account of the complainant speaks volumes of his negligence in allowing the loan amount pouring..........
