LawMirror.com

Results of order+8+rule+5+of+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1491-1500 of 10328 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 190, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 504, 506, 354, 147 -- Quashing of summoning order - Order taking cognizance - Offence u/ss 323, 504, 506, 354, 147 IPC - Detailed cognizance order as well as summoning order passed by Magistrate with judicial application of mind to material available on record - Materials are sufficient..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Service of summons - Judicial order showing that defendants were duly served - However, said order not supported by the documents like service report and copy of summons - Presumption attached to correctness of judicial order thus not available - Claim of defendants to set aside ex parte..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Registered sale deed executed under threat and coercion - Quashing of proceedings - Subsequently civil proceedings initiated to set aside sale deed - At times same facts may give rise to remedies both in civil and criminal law - Proceedings in the instant case cannot be quashed as not a single paisa was actually received by..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 18 -- Inspection of suit property by Court - Remand of case - Both lower Court and Lower Appellate court have powers to inspect property by invoking O.18.R.18 CPC, apart from taking photograph and videograph of place in question - Lower Appellate Court ought not to have remanded matter to Lower Court, instead case could have been..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 9 -- Additional written statement - Partition suit - Defendant by way of additional written statement wants to withdraw the admission of character of property in original written statement - More so, application filed belatedly after closing of evidence - Order allowing application, set aside...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439(2) -- Cancellation of bail - Order granting bail can either be challenged on merits before higher Court or same can be cancelled u/s.437(5) or S.439(2) Cr.P.C. on consideration of relevant factors of misuse in indulging in similar criminal activity, interfering with course of investigation, attempts to tamper with..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 401(2) -- Revision - Right of hearing provided to accused or other person in terms of S.401(2) Cr.P.C if order is passed to their prejudice - This would also therefore mean that where a culpability if shifted from one accused to another, on a revision filed by former, later will also have a right of hearing...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3) -- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Averments made in application and material, if any, in support thereof, if disclose cognizable offence then Magistrate should order registration of FIR and investigation by police - In such a case aggrieved person should not be compelled to collect and produce evidence at his cost to treat..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3) -- Application u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. - Report from police station concerned - If from such report no prima facie case is made against the opposite party, Magistrate is not bound to order for registration of case...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24 -- Transfer of case - Matrimonial dispute - Inconvenience pleaded by wife is completely baseless as distance between Family Court at place `B' is about 54 kms as against 51 kms at place `H' - In any case, in order to compensate wife in alleged inconvenience, it is directed that husband shall pay travelling expenses to wife on her..........

Showing : 1491-1500 of 10328 Results