LawMirror.com

Results of o 8 r 1

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 321-330 of 354 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Provision of S.148 cannot be invoked to grant time beyond the stipulated period of 90 days available under the provision of O.8.R.1 CPC...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- (As amended) - Provision is directory in nature - While extending time to file written statement Court should not exercise discretion arbitrarily - Time can be extended only in exceptional cases after recording reasons in writing...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1-A(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 3 -- Documents - Not produced alongwith written statement - Can be received in evidence at the time of hearing of the suit with the leave of the Court - At that stage Court has to consider only the good cause for non production of those documents earlier - Admissibility and..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, Order 8, Rule 1, 10 -- Written statement - Extension of time to file beyond 90 days from date of service of summons - Can be granted by Court at its discretion on reasonable grounds and in exceptional circumstances to render substantial justice to parties - Word `Shall' used in the provision not mandatory - Ground for delay stated..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Proviso - Written statement - Outer limit of 90 days for filing written statement - Cannot be extended - S.148 CPC has no application...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Original jurisdiction - Procedure - Governed by Original side rules and provisions of CPC do not apply - Original side rules are not repealed by amended CPC...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 1 -- (As amended) - O.5.R.1 & O.8.R.1 as amended by Act 22 of 2002 do not apply to proceedings filed before the Amendment Act came into force...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 --(As amended) - Suit instituted before commencement of Amendment Act 2002 - Provisions of O.5.R.1 and O.8.R.1 not applicable - Court in its discretion may permit filing of written statement even beyond period of 90 days...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1(5), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 2 -- Document - Not filed in Court with pleadings - Such document cannot be produced without leave of Court - Object of O.8.R.1(5) is to exclude suspicious documents and documents, genuineness of which is doubtful, being received in evidence...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 9, 10, 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 1 -- Use of word 'Shall' in O.5.R.1, O.8.R.1, O.8.R.9 and O.8.R.10 - It cannot be said that the said provisions are mandatory...........

Showing : 321-330 of 354 Results