LawMirror.com

Results of plot

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 401-410 of 1012 Results

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Plot ballottement - Surrender of plot - Once the complainant surrendered the plot of his free consent and accepted the amount after deduction of 10% of the price of the plot as per HUDA policy, he is not a consumer of the OP's - If the complainant had any grievance with respect to the non - development of the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab Urban Estates (Sale of Sites) Rules, 1965, Rule 2(aa), 2(e), 4, 5 -- Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964 - 'Provisional price', 'tentative price' - There is nothing in the Act or Rules from which it can be inferred that tentative price is synonymous with the provisional price and that a person to whom the plot has been allotted on provisional..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Plot - Surrender of plot - Refund made which was accepted by the complainant without any protest - After surrender of the plot and getting refund of the deposited amount the complainant is not 'Consumer' of the OP - The complainant cannot claim restoration of plot...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Flat allotment -- Deficiency in service - Compensation - Alternative plot - By inadvertent mistake flat allotted which did not exist at the site - Alternative plot allotted which was no acceptable to the respondent - Direction by District Forum for giving possession of alternative plot on payment of requisite charges without any interest or incase complainant not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Industrial plot - Plea by OP that complainant cannot be considered to be a consumer since he had availed the services for commercial purpose - Held that it is not a case of purchase of goods inasmuch as allotment of plot being an immovable property does not fall within the definition of 'goods' in Section 2(1)(i)..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1) -- Consumer - Industrial plot - Plea by OP that complainant had availed the services of the OP for commercial purposes - The availing of services for commercial purpose was included in Section 2(d) (ii) of CP Act only w.e.f. 15.3.2003 and prior to that services availed for commercial purpose had not been included - The allotment..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Industrial plot - Deficiency in service - Plot allotment - Possession given on 19.4.1996 - Complaint filed in the year 2000 - Application for condonation of delay filed on the ground that the infrastructure facilities were not provided by the OP and no action taken for removal of HT line of 11 KVA which was passing..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Industrial plot - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Allegation of lack of basic essential minimum facilities and passing of HT line over the plot - Plea that construction could not be completed due to non - availability of basic essential facilities repelled in view of the terms of allotment letter - The..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952, Section 8A -- Resumption of site - Petitioner failed to raise construction despite extension granted several times - Administration resumed plot - Petitioner explained that he suffered heart attack and his father also died in whose name plot stood and transfer of ownership in the name of heirs including petitioner..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Capital of Punjab Development and Regulation Act, 1952, Chandigarh Sale of Sites and Building Rules,1960 -- Sale of plot in public auction - Sale cancelled - Neither sale deed executed nor consideration paid nor possession taken by the auction purchaser - Held, the mere fact that the auction purchaser was the highest bidder does not warrant an inference that contract has..........

Showing : 401-410 of 1012 Results