LawMirror.com

Results of plot

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 661-670 of 995 Results

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Plot allotment -- Alternative plot - Compensation - Possession of plot could not be given for 18 years as the plot allotted was involved in litigation - Held that it amounts to deficiency in service - Appellant-OP liable to offer for possession an alternative plot at the same price for which the original plot had been allotted and which could not be offered for possession..........

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Housing -- Sale of an unapproved plot - Before launching scheme and inviting public to the buy plots, opposite party must either inform that the plots which are said to be sold are either approved or not - If they are not approved, they would take steps for getting the approval and, can execute the sale deed only after such approval is granted - Such precaution has not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Housing -- Possession of plot not delivered - Interest - Claim of - District Forum awarded payment of interest @ 18% on the deposited amount till the date of handing over the possession - No illegality...........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Electricity -- Application for removal of electric polls from plot - Polls not removed despite deposit of required amount - Direction to refund the amount with interest @ 12% upheld - Order of payment of compensation of Rs. 1,000/- set aside...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- New plea in appeal - When can be allowed - Title of property - Not in dispute - No Plea - Denial also not there - Issue not framed - Title of plaintiffs over suit plot also admitted by defendants in written statement - Plea by defendant that plaintiffs had admitted that they were owner and in possession of only some portion of..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Plot allotment -- Deficiency in service - Refund - Plot of land allotted in the year 1997 - Full cost of plot deposited in February, 1998 - Respondents not made any basic facilities and amenities where the plot in question allotted - Refund of amount sought - Held that there is clear case of deficiency in service - Respondents directed to refund to appellant total amount..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements Regulations) 1979 -- Regulation 6 - The term 'Residential House' - Includes construction of a residential flat above the commercial plot if it is permissible...........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 15 -- Refund of money on failure of HUDA to deliver possession of allotted plot - HUDA if not in a position to make developments in the area and to deliver possession of allotted plot to the allottee even after five years of issuance of allotment letter - Not justified in refusing to refund the amount if sought by plot..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 2000, Rule 4(5), 5 -- as amended by Notification dated 5.3.2003 - Interest and penal interest on instalments - Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board duty-bound to provide all facilities like roads, water and sewerage connections etc. in newly established market before possession of plot..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Urban Lands (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Section 2(1) -- Expression `person' - Contention of appellant that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 together own land should be treated as a single unit as single person and thus land in excess of limit - Held that respondents having independent title to the property in question are entitled to two separate units under the said Act -..........

Showing : 661-670 of 995 Results