LawMirror.com

Results of purchase+of+property+by+three

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 431-440 of 1243 Results

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Manufacturing defect - Purchase of Hydraulic Backhoe Loader machine by complainant - Various reports of the inspections conducted on behalf of the OPs clearly indicate that the machine in question was suffering from numerous defects from the very inception and installation of the machine in question held..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Jurisdiction - Consumer Fora - Business - to - business dispute - Purchase of bungalow - The dispute is a dispute between two parties pertaining to settlement of account where a counter - claim has been advanced against the Respondent/complainant by the Petitioner - The matter is therefore to be adjudicated in a civil Court and..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Jurisdiction - Consumer Fora - Business - to - business dispute - Purchase of bungalow - The dispute is a dispute between two parties pertaining to settlement of account where a counter - claim has been advanced against the Respondent/complainant by the Petitioner - The matter is therefore to be adjudicated in a civil Court and..........

NATIONAL GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Jurisdiction - Consumer Fora - Business-to-business dispute - Purchase of bungalow - The dispute is a dispute between two parties pertaining to settlement of account where a counter-claim has been advanced against the Respondent/complainant by the Petitioner - The matter is therefore to be adjudicated in a civil Court and not in..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Agreement to Sell -- Suit for specific performance - Ready and willing - Plaintiff remained present in the office of Sub Registrar on the stipulated date - However, stamp paper for affidavit to this effect purchased the previous day - Plaintiff not cross examined on this aspect - Held, mere purchase of stamp paper for affidavit a day in advance does not in way go against..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 1997, Rule 4(5), 5 -- Auction sale - Penal interest - Purchase of plot by respondent but installment not paid and penal interest Charged - Held that the payment of installments cannot be postponed by the allottee merely on the ground that some of the amenities were not ready - They will be..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 1997, Rule 4(5), 5 -- Auction sale - Penal interest - Purchase of plot by respondent but installment not paid and penal interest Charged - Held that the payment of installments cannot be postponed by the allottee merely on the ground that some of the amenities were not ready - They will be..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 21(b) -- Banking service Housing loan Financier-builder nexus - Amount of loan disbursed is substantially higher than the amount for which the respective flat is registered Complainant sought compensation of Rs 2,00,00/- for suffering and agony caused to the complainant towards reduced value in the property which is..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase by firm for use of Managing partner for his going and coming to his place of work and home and it is for his use for activity of the firm - Plea by OP that car was sold by them to the complainant who is a commercial company and it has been used for a commercial purpose..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, 61, 85, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(c), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rules 65 and 66 - FIR lodged u/ss 22, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act against accused - Accused chemist by business and was carrying sale of medicines with salt (Dextropropoxyphene ,..........

Showing : 431-440 of 1243 Results