LawMirror.com

Results of resolution of company 138

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 28 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company already declared insolvent and a Resolution Professional appointed u/s 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Does not in any manner affect the proceedings arising out of offence u/s 138 of the Act...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by Company - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process issued against Company - Proceedings under the Act can not only be continued but also initiated against accused arraigned by virtue of S.141 of the Act, even after accused company is admitted to insolvency process...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by Company - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process issued against Company - Imposition of moratorium and appointment of Interim Resolution Process only protects corporate entity that has filed for insolvency and not the private persons involved within it - Such private persons have been..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, 142 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint by company - S.142 of the Act does not specify as to who should represent company, if company is complainant - A company can be represented by an employee or even by a known employee, who is duly authorized and empowered to represent the company either by resolution or by a power of..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint by power of attorney of a company/firm - Complaint filed by firm in its name and is represented by its Branch Manager, who has been authorised as per Resolution - There is also a specific assertion in complaint that PW1 is competent to represent firm - PW1 is aware of transactions between..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 31, 32 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by Company - Proceedings under Insolvency Code - (a) After passing of the resolution plan u/s 31 of the IBC by the adjudicating authority & in the light of the provisions of S.32A of the IBC, the criminal proceedings u/s 138 of the NI..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint by company - No resolution on record by company authorizing complainant to file complaint against accused - Complaint dismissed...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Order taking cognizance - Quashing of - Even though there is some technical cliches regarding presentation of complaint in the sense that complaint has not been initiated by a Director of company acting on behalf of company but by an employee of company,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company/Corporation - Complaint by constituted attorney - Attorney not examined - No resolution of company in his favour either by Board of Directors of the complainant corporation or by Managing Director - Complaint not instituted through authorized person - Accused rightly acquitted...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of complaint - Complaint filed by company through its Director - Director was authorized to file complaint in view of valid resolution passed by Company - Contention of petitioner that Director was not an authorized person to file the complaint rejected...........

Showing : 1-10 of 28 Results