LawMirror.com

Results of schedule+property

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 61-70 of 605 Results

SIKKIM HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8 -- Sch. 1 - Property of male Hindu dying intestate - Succession certificate - Right of daughters - Daughters not made parties despite being legal heirs - Mere fact that daughters are married, they do not cease to be Class-I heirs as contended by appellant, as there is no distinction between daughter and a married daughter in Schedule I..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Registration Act, 1908, Section 17, 49, Stamp Act, 1899, Article 47A -- Stamp Act, Explanation I Schedule I - Agreement to sell - Non possessory agreement of sale - Agreement does not fall within scope of Schedule I, Art.47-A, Explanation I of Stamp Act, 1899 - Impugned order that non-possessory agreement of sale cannot be received in evidence set aside...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Madras High Court (Original Statement) Rules, 1956, Order 36, Rule 9 -- Letter Patent (Mad), Cl.15 - Grant of leave - Revocation - Defendant seeking revocation of leave granted to plaintiffs on the ground that suit property is situated outside jurisdiction - Maintainability of suit - Admittedly, agreement for sale was executed only within jurisdiction of this Court and..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 6 - - Daughter - Devolution of interest in coparcenary property : (i) The provisions contained in substituted S.6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confer status of coparcener on the daughter born before or after amendment in the same manner as son with same rights and liabilities; (ii) The rights can be claimed by the daughter born..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 6 -- (As amended) - Daughter - Devolution of interest in coparcenary property : (i) The provisions contained in substituted S.6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confer status of coparcener on the daughter born before or after amendment in the same manner as son with same rights and liabilities; (ii) The rights can be claimed by the..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9, 10 -- Local Commissioner - Decree on the basis of report of Commissioner - In the instant case Commissioner did not go through the plaint and written statement - Commissioner could not understand the purpose for which he was deputed for local inspection - `A' and `B' schedule properties cannot be identified from the sketch..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Amendment sought with regard to boundaries in the schedule of plaint - Plaintiff should have been more careful and more diligent in incorporating the correct schedule of the boundaries to the suit schedule properties at the time of filing the suit or prior to commencement of trial -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Constitution of India,1950 -- Para 5, Sch.V - Scope - Power of Governor - Governor issued Government order erstwhile State of A.P. providing 100% reservation to ST candidates out of whom 33.1/3% shall be women for the post of teachers in schools in scheduled areas - Governor is empowered to apply such law to scheduled area or any part in State subject to such exceptions..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Readiness and willingness - Default in payment schedule, as agreed, attracts the clause of automatic termination of agreement...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of local Commissioner - Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction - Burden in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction is entirely on plaintiff to bring convincing evidence to show his possession over plaint schedule property and for so doing, it is not permissible for plaintiff to invoke O.26.R.9 CPC which is..........

Showing : 61-70 of 605 Results