LawMirror.com

Results of section+151+limitation

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 891-900 of 6139 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Section 49, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(i), 2(1)(d)(ii) -- Statutes - Interpretation - Title of provision or marginal note - Do not afford legitimate aid to construction of the provision - Use of expression in S.49 of the Act 'supply of electricity' cannot be automatically understood as sale, merely because marginal note..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64UM1(A) , 2 , 3 , 4 -- Insurance claim - Surveyor's report - Expert report - Repudiation of claim - Surveyor's report assessed the loss at Rs. 2,50,923 - Claim repudiated on the basis of Expert report - In view of Section 64UM 1(A), 2, 3 and 4 the petitioner company had no competence..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 45 -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Ground of suppression of material information about health - The policy had run for more than two years and there was no default in the payment of premium, Section 45 of Insurance Act not applicable - Life Assured had been medically examined by the doctor of..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 405 -- Word `property' - Meaning of - Held, word `property' is used in IPC in a much wider sense than the expression `movable property' - Whether offence defined in a particular section of IPC can be committed in respect of any particular kind of property will depend not in interpretation of word `property' but on fact whether that..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 -- Rule 3A - Factories Rules, 1952, - Section 5, Factories Act, 1948, - Rice Sheller falls within meaning of factory - Building intended to be used as factory to be raised only after obtaining requisite sanction in terms of Rule 3A - Respondent neither submitted any plans nor any plan sanctioned by competent authority at any time..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(oo) , 25 -- B and 25F - Termination - Continuous service - Finding of fact by the Labour Court that the respondent workman has worked for less than 240 days during the last 12 preceding months from the date of her termination - Benefit of Section 25 - F allowed on the ground that workman had in earlier years of her service completed..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 36(4) -- Authorised representative - Legal Secretary - The authorised representative of respondent No. 1 holding a licence under the Advocates Act and is also a member of the District Bar Association - Contention that he would not fall within ambit of Section 36(4) of the ID Act repelled...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 36(4) -- Authorised representative - Legal practitioner - Implied consent - The consent of the party must be specific and so has to be the leave of the Court - It should be at the beginning of the proceedings so that there remains no ambiguity in the status of the legal practitioner who appears after due consent and leave - Implied..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 63, 65 -- Secondary evidence - A copy of a copy, which is not compared with the original, cannot be received as secondary evidence and such copy is inadmissible in evidence as per Illustration (d) of Section 63 of the Act - In the absence of material to that effect that a copy made from a copy has been so compared is not admissible...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 3, Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973, Section 205, 208 -- Application for sanction of building plan not submitted in form prescribed u/s 3 of the Act - It cannot be taken as a valid application - Rejection of this application - Municipal Committee not supposed to convey decision within 60 days - Site plan would not be deemed to be..........

Showing : 891-900 of 6139 Results