LawMirror.com

Results of s 14 limitation act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 204 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 13, 14 -- Rent and eviction - Plea of advance rent - Plea of tenant that advance rent has been paid to brother of landlord held, contrary to statutory provisions as S.13 of the Act provides limitation of one year to a tenant to seek recovery of any rent paid to landlord or collected by landlord in contravention of provisions of the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Petition u/s 34 of Act of 1996 - Return of petition for representation in proper Court - Delay of 8 days in representation - Extension of time be sought from Court ordering return of petition - However, application u/s 14 of Act of 1963 filed in Court where petition was represented -..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Exclusion of time - Plaintiffs were at liberty to file suit in respect of property situated in jurisdiction of three different High Courts - They choose jurisdiction of one Court for filing suit - It cannot be said that plaintiffs were pursuing fresh cause in a Court having no jurisdiction to adjudicate the same or Court where suit was..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Electricity Act, 2003, Section 126(3), 127, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, 29(2) -- Appeal - Applicability of Limitation Act - Once the Scheme of Electricity Act in conjunction with prescription of different limitation period for different forum in a different manner is read, it is unambiguously clear that applicability of the provisions of Limitation Act is not..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 14 -- Impleadment of a party - Limitation - Suit for price of goods sold and delivered - `H' was impleaded as plaintiff No.2 - However, order does not reveal that newly impleaded plaintiff shall effect from the date of institution of the suit - Thus, limitation will begins to run from the date of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Appeal against ex parte decree - Exclusion of time spent in pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Provision of S.14 of the Act is not applicable in excluding time spent in proceeding U.O.9.R.13 CPC - However, principles analogous to S.14 of the Act would be applicable for purpose..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Arbitration award - Objections - S.14 of Limitation Act is applicable to an application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Arbitration award - Objections - Delay of 131 days in filing application even after getting benefit of S.14 of Limitation Act - That is beyond strict time line prescribed in S.34(3) of the Arbitration Act - Delay of 131 days cannot be condoned...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Scope - Conditions for applicability of the provision are : (i) that plaintiff was prosecuting another civil proceedings with due diligence; (ii) earlier proceedings and later proceedings relates to same matter in issue (iii) former proceeding was prosecuted in good faith in a Court which from defect of jurisdiction or other cause of..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Limitation - Exclusion of time - Provision of S.14 of the Act has no application in a case where suit is dismissed after adjudication on merits and not because Court was unable to entertain it due to lack of jurisdiction...........

Showing : 21-30 of 204 Results