Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326, 324, 34 -- Nature of offence - Merely for the reason that injuries inflicted by A-2 were less than what was inflicted by A-3 and the injuries were not grievous, conviction u/s 326 IPC cannot be converted to S.324 IPC irrespective of the facts whether the injuries caused to injured persons were only on the hand...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 326, 34 -- Offence u/ss 326, 34 IPC - A-2 & A-3 had together assaulted PW1 & PW7 - They were armed with deadly weapon - Merely for the reason that injuries inflicted by A-2 were less than what was inflicted by A-3 and the injuries were not grievous, conviction u/s 326 IPC cannot be converted to S.324 IPC irrespective of the facts whether..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 419, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 -- Cheating - If intent on the face of it is absent qua one of the offences in the same transaction, it is absent in respect of the other offences as well...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 419, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Cheating - Quashing of FIR - Nothing on record to suggest, even prima facie, that any of the ingredients of offence u/s 420 IPC are met in the case of appellant - No intent can be hinted to, where the appellant had willfully, with the intent to defraud, acted..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 323, 504, 506, 34 -- Cruelty - Specific allegation against applicants that they used to demand a sum of Rs.10,00,000 from her for purchasing a car - Statements of parents and brothers of complainant supports her version with respect to demand of dowry and harassment meted out to her on account of failure to fulfill the demand - She..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A, 323, 294, 506, 34, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4 -- Cruelty - Dowry demand - Quashing of proceedings - Allegations against applicants are specific and clear - Real daughter-in-law of applicant No.5 who is sister of applicant No.3/mother-in-law also filed FIR against her - Applicants Nos.3 and 5 who are real sisters are..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 489A, 489B, 489C, 34 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 489-A, 489-B, 489-C, 34 IPC - Six counterfeit currency notes of Rs.500 are subject matter of offence - Appellant has been incarcerated for two and a half years - There are no antecedents of appellant - Trial is not likely to conclude in a reasonable time..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 354(A), 354(B), 376, 323, 506, 34, 498A, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3, 4 -- Offence u/ss 354(A), 354(B), 376, 323, 506, 34, 498-A IPC and Ss.3, 4 of 1961 Act - Quashing of FIR - There was delay of at least four months in lodging FIR - Apart from the verbal allegations, there is nothing on record to connect petitioners with the..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342, 347, 594, 506, 116, 384, 34 -- Offence u/ss 342, 347, 594, 506, 116, 384, 34 IPC - Quashing of FIR - No specific allegations against respondent nos.4 and 5 in the complaint - There is a delay in lodging FIR - Even, no allegation made by husband of complainant in the letter addressed to District Magistrate and District Commissioner -..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 406, 409, 462, 206, 217, 34, 37, 120B -- Quashing of FIR - Cheating - Nothing on record to show that appellant/bank or its staff members had dishonestly induced someone deceived to deliver any property to any person, and that mens rea existed at the time of such inducement - Ingredients to..........
