LawMirror.com

Results of suit+for+declaration+adverse+possession

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 291-300 of 18736 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - At the stage of rebuttal evidence - Suit for mandatory injunction - Amendment sought for substitution of mandatory injunction with word possession - It was more of a clarificatory nature and that plaintiff shall not lead any further evidence - Nature of suit and relief sought would be same but only its..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Ready and willing - Suit filed after 5 years from the date of execution of agreement - No explanation offered by plaintiff for such period of five years - Plaintiff failed to prove his readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract throughout - Suit rightly dismissed...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, Section 3 -- Right of pre-emption - Person seeking right to pre-empt sale deed must exhibit that his right to pre-empt sale deed existed on the date of sale deed, date of institution of suit and thereafter continued till date of passing of decree...........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Suit for specific performance and permanent injunction - Amendment sought to incorporate the fact that registered sale deed executed by defendant no.1 in favour of defendant no.2 is not binding on plaintiff and is null and void - Plaintiff not sought amendment within reasonable time despite defendants..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Sufficient cause - Defendants were not serious to pursue their cause and rather they were totally negligent - On account of non-appearance on three consecutive dates, ex-parte proceedings were drawn against defendants - Even, suit was not finally decided immediately and even thereafter..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Attesting witness to agreement to sell proved that amount was paid by plaintiff to defendant - Source of earnest money of Rs.10,31,000 is fully proved by plaintiff - Defendant led no evidence to rebut the testimony of attesting witness regarding earnest money having been paid in his presence - Suit rightly decreed...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Bar of civil Court jurisdiction - Agricultural land - Issue raised in plaint pertains to sale deed being voidable - Civil Court thus, had jurisdiction to try suit and bar created by S.207 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act had no application - Application rightly rejected...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Un-stamped agreement to sell - Agreement to sell is neither registered nor sufficiently stamped - Said agreement to sell could not have been considered for any purpose for accepting plaintiff's case - However, when defendant has not denied execution of document, so also receipt of part of..........

MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Subsequent suit instituted relates to same subject matter and dispute which was subject matter in earlier suit - Earlier suit had proceeded ex parte against predecessor-in-interest - Since subject matter in subsequent suit was the same as earlier suit which was been decreed - Subsequent suit is barred by res..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 3 -- Misdescription of property - It is a fundamental defect rendering suit not maintainable - Court cannot enter into merits of case after holding of misdescription of property - First Appellate Court rightly held that observations of trial Court regarding title and possession of either of the parties would not operate as res..........

Showing : 291-300 of 18736 Results