LawMirror.com

Results of summoning+order

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1011-1020 of 1423 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190(1)(a), 200 -- Personal examination of complainant - Metropolitan Magistrate instead of personally examining the concerned officer of the complainant and reducing substance of his examination into writing chose to act upon affidavit tendered by him in evidence and thereafter passed impugned order summoning the petitioner - Legality..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheque signed by accused in the capacity of Director of the Company - Sufficient averments in complaint to satisfy the requirements of S.141 of the Act - Order setting aside issuance of summoning order set aside - Complaint restored for decision in accordance with law...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Petitioner nothing to do either with the proprietorship firm or with the proprietor of the firm - Petitioner not even remotely connected with the proceedings u/s 138 of the Act - Mere a vague assertion in complaint, without satisfying statutory requirement as per S.141 of the Act is such a circumstance,..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3, 4, 6, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Police case and complaint case qua the same occurrence - Occurrence reported to police and complaint under different provisions of IPC registered - Subsequently complaint case filed of the same occurrence alleging offence under SCST Act..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 397 -- Summoning record of cross case - High Court granted stay on an order passed by Magistrate u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. directing police to register and investigate case - Pursuant to the order of High Court FIR was not registered - There is no question of any cross case pending in any Court - Trial Court rejected application - Order..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Additional accused - Giving Lalkara and filthy abuses - No hope or prospect of conviction of additional accused - Order summoning additional accused set aside...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 204, 202, 200 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Summoning order - Recall - Magistrate has no jurisdiction to recall its own summoning order...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, 401 -- Additional accused - Summoning of - Revision against - Names of petitioners have been specifically mentioned in FIR - FIR corroborates statement of complainant - Held, it is not an afterthought - Complainant has specifically stated that petitioners also harassed her with respect to demand of dowry - Statement of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Additional accused - Summoning - S.319 Cr.P.C. applies to all the Courts including the Sessions Court - It empowers the Court to add any person, not being the accused before it, but against whom there appears during trial sufficient evidence indicating his involvement in the offence, as an accused and direct him to be tried..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319 -- Additional accused - Summoning - Offence triable by Sessions Court - S.319(4)(b) is a deeming provision dispensing with the formal committal order against the newly added accused - Such person must be deemed to be an accused at the time of commitment because it is at that point of time the Sessions Court in law takes cognizance..........

Showing : 1011-1020 of 1423 Results