LawMirror.com

Results of telegraph+act%27

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 121-130 of 139 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Telephone - Excessive billing - Arbitration - Department not permitted to disconnect telephone before dispute raised has been adjudicated...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Rules, 1951, Rule 443 -- 'Due' - Meaning...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Statement of consumer to make payment, but protest against bills - Constitute dispute - Arbitration to follow...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Arbitration - Procedure - Principles of Arbitration Act are applicable in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provision of S.7-B...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Arbitration - Initiation - Either party can make application to Central Government...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Arbitration - Scope...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 3(6) -- 'Telegraph Authority' - Meaning - Telegraph Authority is different from Central Government...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Rules, 1951, Rule 443, 511 -- Disconnection of telex service under an account of non payment of dues - Bad - Telex service to be dealt under Rule 511 and not under Rule 443...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telephone -- In the nme of partnership firm - Default in payment-Telephone connection of partners in their individual capacity can be disconnected for default committed by the partnership firm. (Telegraph Act 1885, S.7 & Telegraph Rules, 1951, R.443)...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Telegraph Rules, 1951, Rule 443 -- Rule 443 is not discriminatory for giving different treatment to a subscriber firm and a subscriber limited company as a firm, not a legal entity, cannot be compared with a company, a legal entity...........

Showing : 121-130 of 139 Results