Showing : 361-370 of 816 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, 14(3)-- Proceedings for making award a rule of the Court continued for a considerable time - Later on it transpired that award under Arbitration Act, 1940 could not be enforced and remedy is available u/s 34 of 1996 Act - Considerable delay thus caused - Application accompanied by an application u/s 5 of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay of 569 days in filling appeal by State - Due to heavy load of work it slipped out of mind that case has been decided - Not believable - No sufficient reason assigned - Order dismissing application upheld - Chief Secretary directed to hold departmental enquiry and fix..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay of 1460 days in refiling the appeal - In order to succeed in the application for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal applicant is required to make out a strong case in his application supported by an affidavit, either of the litigant or a person who knew about the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay in filing objections to arbitration award - Condonation - Period of limitation cannot be extended even by invoking S.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - Provision of S.34(3) of the Act is very stringent in its nature and Court cannot extend the time even if appellant has a strong case on merit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Condonation of delay - Separate application for condonation of delay is not required when all the ingredients of the application for condonation of delay are mentioned in the application U.O.9.R.13 CPC to set aside the exparte decree...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Condonation of delay - Separate application for condonation of delay is not required when all the ingredients of the application for condonation of delay are mentioned in the application U.O.9.R.13 CPC to set aside the exparte decree...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Delay of 26 days - Delay explained on ground of sickness of petitioner's mother - Merely for the reason that petitioner's mother was not an in-door patient, justification for delay cannot be ignored - Non filing of affidavit in support of application is just a technical..........
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Housing - Land - Development agreement - Complainant got possession on 3.3.1999 and as per the Agreement after getting owner's allocation no further reciprocal liability among and Owner and the Developer will lie - Complaint filed on 3.12.2009 i.e. after 10 years and 9 months from the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Delay is just one of the ingredients which has to be considered - Court must also take into consideration the conduct of the parties, bona fide reasons for condonation of delay and whether such delay could easily be avoided by the applicant acting with normal care and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - Onus to show that sufficient cause exists for condonation of delay lis upon the applicant...........

Showing : 361-370 of 816 Results