LawMirror.com

Results of evidence s 92

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 102 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Registered sale deed - Neither party can claim that the terms of sale such as consideration, or the nature of transaction/disposition is, in fact, different from that contained in the document itself...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Document required by law to be in writing - No evidence of any oral agreement between the parties for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to, or subtracting from its terms shall be admitted, though there are exceptions to both the provisions of Ss.91 & 92 of the Act...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92 -Once the contents of the document are clear, oral evidence to contradict the same cannot be adduced...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Oral evidence to contradict terms/facts stated in the document is inadmissible - The terms and conditions of a written document cannot be explained or controverted by oral evidence and such oral evidence is inadmissible - One of the exception where oral evidence is admissible is when a party claims that the document itself is a sham..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 92 -- Written document - Parol evidence contradicting contents of written document is inadmissible in evidence in view of S.92 of Evidence Act...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Recital in deed as to possession is not a `term' of the contract - Oral evidence of same is admissible to show that as against recital in document that possession of property was transferred, there was no such transfer of possession - Such evidence is not excluded by Ss.91 & 92 of the Act...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Exclusion of oral evidence - Provisions of Ss.91 & 92 of Evidence Act do not apply for proving want of consideration or failure of consideration...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Oral evidence - Exclusion of - Validity of sale deeds containing only the signatures of vendors and not of vendees - Held, sale deeds are contracts within the meaning of S.91 - Attract exclusion of oral evidence u/s 92 for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to or subtracting from the terms of..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 63,64,65,66,92 -- Carbon copy of document - Admissibility - Plaintiff admitted his signatures on the carbon copy - Held, document stands proved and has been rightly exhibited...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92, 3, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 54 -- Sale deed - Payment of price - There is no bar for adducing oral evidence either u/ss 91 & 92 to prove payment of price for the sale or existence of sale u/s 54 of Transfer of Property Act...........

Showing : 41-50 of 102 Results