Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Prosecution witnesses establishing demand and acceptance of tainted money by accused person at time of registration of Will - Recovery of tainted money has not been challenged - Failure of accused in rebutting presumption u/s.20 of the Act - Guilt of accused established beyond..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Presumption - Accused Sub Inspector of police allegedly demanded Rs.1000 from complainant in order to permit him to sign bail bond papers - Currency notes were recovered from hip pocket of accused - Immediate explanation offered by accused was that money was thrust into his pocket..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Demand for renewal of licence - Licence already renewed - No occasion for accused to have demanded money - Accused acquitted...........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - A-1 & A-2 demanded Rs.2000 from complainant for withdrawal of demand notice for payment of Excise duty, which was illegally issued by A-1 - Tainted money was recovered from A-2 as A-1 was absent from office at the time of acceptance - Although both the accused..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Punjab Money Lenders Act, 1938, Section 3, 4 - - Dishonour of cheque - Money lender - Advancement of loan - Complainant advancing agricultural loan to petitioner/farmer without holding licence under Money-Lender's Act, is illegal and complainant can also be prosecuted for the same - Contention of complainant that said issue..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Accused convicted though complainant turned hostile and stated that no money was demanded by accused, as other cogent evidence regarding demand and acceptance proved against him - Accused rightly convicted...........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Conviction for - Challenge against - Authority demanding money for mutation of name of complainant in land revenue records - Complainant through evidence clearly establishing twin requirement of demand of money and acceptance of same - Complainant through evidence established that ten..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Accused allegedly demanded Rs.1500 from complainant but he paid only 250 out of which accused returned 50 to complainant as he had no money left - It casts a serious shadow of doubt on sequence of events - None of PWs actually deposed that accused demanded and accepted bribe money -..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Phenolphthalein test - Colour of other samples was pink and remained throughout however, lime solution in which hands of accused were dipped does not show pink colour - Phenolphthalein test cannot be said to be conclusive proof against accused - Sample of shirt worn by accused does..........
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - On direction of appellant tainted money handed over to A2 - No evidence that acceptance of bribe money through A2 was completed by accepting money from A2 and ultimately recovery was also effected from appellant by the usual practice of hand wash of appellant - No evidence as to..........
