LawMirror.com

Results of op

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 131-140 of 1236 Results

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Insurance policy - Consumer - Premium payment - Non issuance of receipt - Liability of principal for the acts of agent - Agent collected Cheque for premium and got it encashed but did not deposit the premium amount with the appellants and no receipt for deposit of premium issued - Plea of the appellant..........

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - OP No. 1 - doctor did not bring to the notice of OP No. 2 doctor the existence of the appendicular lump which ex facie indicates negligence on her part - All through till the respiratory distress gained its footage the first OP had not bothered to consult the OP No. 2 who performed the surgery - The OP No. 1 thus rendered negligent..........

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - Consent of the patient taken for conducting surgery and instructions issued for shaving the chest of the patient but surgery not conducted - What is the cause of not performing surgery not forthcoming from OP No. 1 and the patient died - OP No. 1 had rendered deficient service by not performing surgery on the husband of the complainant..........

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Marine Hull Policy -- Boat - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - Ground that the capsized boat was not seaworthy by the time of its insurance and it has let it out and that fact was suppressed at the time of issuing policy - Report of the seaworthiness of the vessel was given prior to issue of policy - It was also observed by the Surveyor that..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Advertisement - Car booking - Mercedes Benz E - 250D - Booking of complainant matured in May, 1997 and he paid balance price of the car and took delivery without any stipulation about the replacement of the vehicle by an upgraded model in case a new model was launched within a particular time frame -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase by firm for use of Managing partner for his going and coming to his place of work and home and it is for his use for activity of the firm - Plea by OP that car was sold by them to the complainant who is a commercial company and it has been used for a commercial purpose..........

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - Delivery of child - Cesarean surgery - The OPs failed to administer massage to the uterus of the complainant though there was abnormal bleeding and OP party No.2 diagnosed her to have suffered from PPH - Right from the deputation of nurse for the post - operative stage treatment at OP No. 1 hospital till the complainant was shifted to..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Advertisement - Car booking - Mercedes Benz E - 250D - Booking of complainant matured in May, 1997 and he paid balance price of the car and took delivery without any stipulation about the replacement of the vehicle by an upgraded model in case a new model was launched within a particular time frame -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase by firm for use of Managing partner for his going and coming to his place of work and home and it is for his use for activity of the firm - Plea by OP that car was sold by them to the complainant who is a commercial company and it has been used for a commercial purpose..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1) -- UTI Mastergain 1992 - Transfer of unit - Delay to 3 to 15 months - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Total value of units being around Rs. 49,00,000/ - - It will adequately meet the ends of justice if a lump sum compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/ - is awarded to the complainant to be paid by OP Nos. 1 and 2 jointly and..........

Showing : 131-140 of 1236 Results