LawMirror.com

Results of o 9 r 13 civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 151-160 of 1069 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 29, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Execution - Dismissal of objections - Issuance of warrant of possession - During pendency of application for setting aside of exparte decree - Till application U.O.9.R.13 CPC is decided (though expeditiously), it would prejudice the petitioners, possibly irreparably, if order of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Counsel could not appear due to boycott of Courts by Advocates - Sufficient cause shown for non appearance - Ex parte decree set aside...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, 6(a), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Defendant proceeded ex parte on the date when case was fixed for recording defendants' evidence - It was a case where defendants did not lead any evidence - However, plaintiff was present and had led his evidence - Trial Court proceeded to..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 101 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Service of summons - Defendant denied service of summons - Burden to prove service of summons is on the person who asserts that defendant was served with summons - There is no proof of service of summons when merely certified copy of bailiff report is produced..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article 123 -- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside of - Limitation - As per Explanation provided to Art.123 of Limitation Act, period of limitation would commence from date of knowledge of decree when defendant is served U.O.5.R.20 CPC - In the instant..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Setting aside of ex-parte decree - Delay of 920 days - Condonation of delay - JD already aware of ex-parte decree - No satisfactory explanation for said long delay - Delay not condoned...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Suit for specific performance - Defendant had been lackadaisical and tardy in not contesting the suit - It cannot be believed that defendant did not have knowledge of pendency of suit as before filing of the suit a legal notice under registered cover was served - Plaintiff in pursuance to..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Appeal against ex parte decree - Exclusion of time spent in pursuing application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Provision of S.14 of the Act is not applicable in excluding time spent in proceeding U.O.9.R.13 CPC - However, principles analogous to S.14 of the Act would be applicable for purpose..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside - Suit for specific performance - In the absence of any evidence, bald insinuations made by appellants and their predecessor-i, interest against previous advocate does not constitute a ground to vacate ex-parte decree...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside - Service of summons - Summons duly served - Burden is on defendant to prove that summons in fact does not contain his signature or that it bears his forged signatures - It was the burden of defendant to lead positive evidence to prove that summon does not bear his signature like, producing..........

Showing : 151-160 of 1069 Results