LawMirror.com

Results of partition land revenue

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 41-50 of 362 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 117 -- Partition proceedings - Abeyance of - Claim of petitioner is based on an agreement to sell - Suit for specific performance is pending where respondent No.3 has been restrained from alienating suit property - Said suit was filed in year 2008 and is yet to be decided - Both parties are recorded as owners of disputed land - Held,..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Section 247, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 54 -- Partition - Effecting of - Appeal - Refusal to grant stay - Legality of - Two questions were raised in appeal u/s 247 before the S.D.O. - (i) that no notice was issued to respondent No.1 and (ii) that partition was hit by provisions of S.8AA of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111 -- Private partition - Proof - Held, merely on the basis of entry of mutation, which was never sanctioned, it cannot be said that there was any private partition among co-sharers of total joint land - Non-sanctioning of mutation regarding alleged private partition and no, reflection thereof in revenue record for five long decades..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111 -- Private partition - Concurrent finding of fact - Second appeal - Concurrent finding of fact recorded by both Courts below rejected plea of plaintiff regarding private partition - Said finding of fact is based on proper analysis and appreciation of evidence led by both parties - Held,..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 121 -- Partition - Question of title - Jurisdiction of revenue court - Held, revenue court is equally competent to decide question of title and could also refer same to civil court if there was really such dispute and matter which need a debate in depth...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 117 -- Partition - Question of title - Determination of - Plaintiffs raised question of title in partition application before Revenue Court - Revenue Court proceeded to partition land without determining question of title or without getting the question of title determined from competent Court -..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Injunction - Refusal - Plaintiff has neither pleaded nor shown that he was exercising any ownership right on the land by cultivating it or otherwise - He did not make any effort to get the share partitioned by meets and bounds - Plaintiff waited and watched defendants to use property to file a suit - In between he allowed..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 121, 123 -- Private partition - Evidence on record shows that partition of shamlat land effected long back among co-sharers and every co-sharer put into possession of his respective share - Factum of partition and possession of respective co-sharer authenticated by revenue officials while recording entries in their record - Held,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111 -- Co-sharer - There can be no severance of status of co-sharer with the preparation of Naksha B - However, after the instrument of partition is prepared, status of co-sharer comes to an end...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111 -- Partition - Allowed - Mode of partition sanctioned - Naksha Be approved - Thereafter appellant submitting application for withdrawal of partition on ground that 6 Bighas and 15 Marlas of land was not included in partition - Held, after confirmation of the mode of partition, appellant cannot be permitted to withdraw from the..........

Showing : 41-50 of 362 Results