Service -- Parity of pay - It is not always impermissible to provide two different pay scale in the same cadre...........
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 12 -- Contempt of Court - Violation of order of Supreme Court - Grievance that petitioners were not re-instated as per Court`s order - However, there is no direction in order passed by Supreme Court to reinstate petitioners or place them in minimum pay scale - Contempt jurisdiction cannot be invoked on the basis of impressions, when..........
Service -- Voluntary abandonment of service - Admittedly, Bank has provided 4 alternative positions which are at par with existing pay scale and emoluments of appellants - However, appellant refused to accept any of them - Conduct of appellant constitute voluntary abandonment of service as appellant herself declined to accept various offers of service in the Bank...........
Service -- Post of Lecturer - Pay scale - Artificial break of one day - Benefit of pay as claimed on the basis of Government Resolutions was denied to appellant only on the ground of lack of continuous service, as there was break of one day in service - Said artificial break of one day arising only from change in educational curriculum having no fault of appellant and she..........
Service -- Post of Lecturer - Pay scale - Delay and laches - Issue regarding pay scale agitated before different authorities and alleged delay in filing writ petition cannot stand in way of appellant getting benefit for services - Relevant pay scale will entitled her to emoluments which were admissible to her for work already performed...........
Service jurisprudence -- Contractual appointment - It is neither made against a particular post nor on pay scale - If advertisement as well as appointment was made initially for limited period, nature of appointment cannot be termed as contractual appointment, but it is a Tenure Post...........
Service -- Pensionary benefits - Respondent retired from the post of Train Examiner - Pension of respondent correctly fixed on that basis - However, respondent claiming benefit of revised pay of Junior Engineer Grade-II, as he alleged to be re-designated to said post - Tribunal rightly rejected said claim by concluding that pension of respondent could not be on par with..........
Service -- Revised pay scale - Interest - Contentious issues involved in the matter - No justification for granting interest on the revised pay scale - Emoluments in revised pay scale directed to be paid within three months...........
Service -- Fixation of pay scale - Reduction of basic pay - Absorption of Company into subsidiary company - Assurance of pay protection to employees of company transferred to its subsidiary company was given - Pay fixation was to be made in the manner that total emoluments drawn were not less - Employees who were receiving old pay scale principle of fitment in revised pay..........
Service -- Officiating charge - Employee was holding higher post and he was performing duties of higher responsibility attached to the post - Benefit of higher pay scale attached to said higher post granted to employee, particularly, when Rules applicable to said post do not prohibit grant of pay scale...........
