Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17 -- Adulteration - Sample of tomato soup - Plea regarding mixing of additive - As tomato soup is not included in the list of food articles in which usage of such synthetic food colours is permitted and therefore addition of colour to tomato soup was not permissible under the Act - Conviction upheld...........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 32(e), (i) -- Misbranded choco pie - Public Analyst Report shows that sample was found misbranded for no, declaration of "Batch No./Lot No." and "Best Before" as per Rule 32(e), (i) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - However, date of manufacture and date of..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of a witness to prove the acknowledgement of statutory notice u/s 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Court does not have to see the advantage or disadvantage of particular litigant but Court has to consider the documents, which is necessary for just decision of case - As Notice in question which is duly..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 10(2) -- Act is intended for prevention of sale of adulterated food, but no offence can be launched against purchaser, who purchased such article of food...........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 10(2) -- Sample of black pepper - Black pepper, which is alleged to be adulterated is a primary food and in view of S.10(2) Proviso, taking of sample of such article of food, if it is not intended for sale as such, is prohibited - Petitioner not intending to sell black pepper as such - Sample of such article should not..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 10(2) -- Sample of black pepper - No allegation that black pepper is used for sale of an article of food manufactured there from without a licence or it is prohibited by food authority or food stored is in contravention of any other provision of Act or Rules made there under - No offence can be launched against..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Adulteration - Sample of mustard oil - Re-analysis of second sample - Accused has been deprived of his statutory right to have the second sample analyzed through CFL as second sample not produced from C.M.H.O. office in Court for nearly seventeen years despite repeated directions - No useful purpose would be..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(i), 16(1)(a), 11(3), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 -- Sample of Adulterated milk - Sending sample to public analyst - Food inspector obtained sample of milk from bulk of milk kept in container - Nothing on record to show that before taking sample of milk it was thoroughly mixed by stirring or by..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Section 13(1), 13(2)(d), 7 - - Illegal gratification - Demand of Rs.8,000/- by Sub Inspector of police for not arresting PW2 - Currency notes recovered from accused which were lying on table - Hand wash of accused turned pink and corroborated by FSL report - Conscious demand and acceptance of bribe amount proved - Presumption..........
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2) -- Sample of Red Chilly Powder - Presence of salt i.e. Sodium Chloride by 2.5% weight as well as presence of total ash exceeding prescribed limit - Held, sufficient to hold that sample was adulterated, even if one was to proceed on basis that mere addition of common salt to chilly power did not render it injurious to..........
