Showing : 1051-1060 of 7325 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Eviction petition of tenant from a shop on ground of personal necessity - Proof of - Held, a NRI landlord is required to prove that (i) he is a NRI (ii) he has returned to India and required property for his use or for use of any one ordinarily living with him and dependent on him..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Eviction petition - leave to defend - Held, tenant's affidavit asking for leave to contest NRI landlord's application is required to be confined to grounds which NRI landlord has to prove...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Whether an NRI landlord, who is a co-owner in two different properties which are in occupation of the tenants, can maintain a petition u/s 13-B of the Act after filing of the petition by his co-owners as NRI in respect of the other property - Held, NRI landlord, who is co-owner in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)-- Bona fide requirement - Eviction petition on the ground that premises is required for expansion of business - Held, fact of joining two sons in business is only an additional need and not sole basis for seeking eviction of tenants as landlord themselves wanted tenanted premises for personal use..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B-- NRI landlord - Co-owner - An order of ejectment obtained by a NRI - Co-owner will bind other co-owners but will not entitle other NRI and/or a co-owner to seek ejectment of tenant from another building either owned solely by such co-owner or jointly with other persons as co-owner in exercise of..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a)-- Eviction petition filed by landlord through attorney on ground of bona fide necessity of son to set up hospital at Jalandhar, though son already running hospital at Ludhiana - Tenant contended that landlord had renounced world and there is no evidence on record of any correspondence between..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, Section 189-- Construction in violation of statutory limit - Construction has been made without following statutory provisions relating to construction and reconstruction of buildings within municipal limit - Demolition without putting the parties to notice cannot be passed - Having regard to the fact that..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(iii)-- Eviction petition - Impairing value and utility - Eviction sought on ground that tenant had illegally and unauthorisedly encroached upon area by including verandah of shop after replacing shutter - Fact of extending shop by encroaching verandah proved on record - No evidence brought by tenant..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(ii)(a), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27-- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground of sub-letting - Eviction order passed - In first appeal sub tenant sought to produce evidence to substantiate his claim that he is direct tenant - Production of additional evidence rejected by Appellate Court - Second Appeal - Held, documents which are of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 5-- Res judicata - Unauthorized occupants - Ejectment of tenant - Application for ejectment was previously dismissed on the ground that tenants were not in unauthorized and the payment of leases showed that there had been a continuation of lease and that they were tenants holding over - Thereafter,..........

Showing : 1051-1060 of 7325 Results