LawMirror.com

Results of s 39 of specific relief

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 61-70 of 246 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Bar of limitation - Agreement in question executed in 1980 - Whereas, suit filed in 1992 - There is nothing to show that agreement was to be kept alive for such a long time - Moreover, agreement itself is not proved, therefore, no suit for claiming any relief in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, 38 -- Revocation of licence - Suit for mandatory injunction and in the alternative for possession and for permanent injunction restraining appellant from applying for an electric connection to the Electricity Department in his name - Parties to the suit are closely related and record reveals that in spite of consistent requests made..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Removal of wall and to keep service lane open as an approach way - Defendant specifically pleaded that wall was constructed on the basis of permission granted by defendant no.2 vide sanction order - Said sanction order not denied by plaintiff - However, there is admittedly no challenge to said sanction order -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Suit mandatory and permanent injunction - Directing defendant to close main gate, which had been opened illegally, causing obstruction in usage and occupation of plaintiff - Defendant purchased his house and got it repaired after getting site plan sanctioned from M.C. - As per sanctioned..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 41 -- Injunction and temporary injunction - Parameters for deciding temporary injunction application and suit for permanent prohibitory injunction are entirely different - One is governed by O.39.Rr.1,2 CPC and the other is decided on the basis of provisions contained in Specific Relief..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 14(1)(c)(e) -- Interim injunction - Private contract of personal service - Courts do not grant injunctions to direct continuation of a contract which by its terms is determinable vide Ss.14(1)(c), 41(e) of Specific Relief Act...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Unauthorised construction - Not proved with description on the land where it stood - Mandatory injunction, rightly, declined...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Both parties agreed to leave passage of 5 feet each from their land and in this way total width of passage will be 10 feet - As per case of plaintiff he had left 8 feet wide passage from his land - Plaintiff failed to prove this fact and also that defendant encroached upon the passage by constructing a wall -..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Permanent prohibitory injunction - Restraining defendant from interfering in exclusive possession of plaintiff over suit land or from raising construction - Plaintiff himself admitted that defendant had laid foundation of shop in question prior to institution of suit with his consent - Defendant on the other hand also..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 39 -- Suit for declaration and mandatory injunction - Auction - Highest bid - Bid never accepted by concerned authorities - There was no concluded contract - Merely on the granting the declaration that rejection was illegal and arbitrary and by incompetent authority, further relief of mandatory injunction could not have been granted -..........

Showing : 61-70 of 246 Results