LawMirror.com

Results of 381 ipc

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results

MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 417, 418, 381, 408, 120B, 34 -- Interim bail - Cheating - Allegations made against petitioners are serious in nature, more so, conduct of petitioners have been portrayed as on defying due course of justice by indulging in activities which are contrary to law - Though, allegations are yet to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 381, 120B -- Bail - Offence u/ss 381, 120-B IPC - Investigating agency already concluded the investigation and submitted final report u/s 173 Cr.P.C - Trial of case has not made any progress, as none of PWs is examined so far - Case is triable by Magistrate - Culpability if any would be determined..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 380, 381, 457, 411, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 25 -- Quashing of FIR - Theft - Confession of co-accused - Petitioner named by co-accused in his disclosure statement - No recovery has been effected from petitioner - Even otherwise, confession made by accused in police custody is inadmissible in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 381, Post Office Act, 1898, Section 52, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 31 -- Theft by post-office employee - Imposition of sentence for offences under IPC as well as Post office Act at one trial - Directions issued to run both the sentences `concurrently'...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 451, 381, 120B -- Theft and trespassing - Articles stolen were of serious nature but accused had no ulterior motive except to cause some nuisance to the employer - No evidence to show that accused had stored the articles for the purpose of gaining any financial benefit nor did they make any attempt to sell away these articles to some others..........

Showing : 1-5 of 5 Results