Service -- Re-evaluation of answer sheets - Inter-se seniority - Once on re-evaluation, marks are increased respective candidates whose marks are increased will have to be placed at appropriate place in merit list - Non-grant of seniority based on revised marks would render the process of re-evaluation redundant - Candidates whose marks had been increased shall be..........
Service -- Dispute as to inter se seniority between direct recruits and promotees - Persons selected and appointed by nomination/direct recruits are eligible only after prescribed course of training - Person who successfully completes the training effectively gets the monetary compensation for his training period but period spent on training and other period of probation..........
Service -- Determination of inter-se seniority on basis of roster points - Roster points do not determine seniority of appointees who gain simultaneous appointments i.e those who are appointed collectively on the same date or are deemed to be appointed on the same date, irrespective when they joined their posts - Roster system is only for purpose of ensuring quantum of..........
Service -- Promotion - Inter-se seniority - Higher pay in same grade as per applicable Rules, is a reliable indicator for determining inter-se seniority...........
Service -- Promotion - Inter-se seniority - Clear service record - Employer's preference for a person with a clean service record can be well appreciated while determining inter-se seniority...........
Service -- Promotion - Inter-se seniority - Appellant entered service prior to respondent in the higher grade and he was thus, senior to respondent - Overlooking inter-se seniority position of two, respondent was granted accelerated promotion - Admittedly, pay scale drawn by appellant was higher than respondent - Moreover, respondent was penalized pursuant to disciplinary..........
Service -- Inter se seniority - Where selections are held separately by different recruiting authorities, principle of initial date of appointment/continuous officiating may be the valid principle to be considered for adjudging inter se seniority of officers in the absence of any rule or guidelines in determining seniority to contrary...........
Service -- Inter se seniority - Matter of adjudging seniority of candidates selected in one and the same selection, placement in the order of merit can be adopted as a principle for determination of seniority...........
Judicial service -- Promotion through Limited Competitive Examinations (LCE) - Dispute concerns seniority inter se - R.11(4)(b) of Rules 2017 alters criteria for determination of seniority from merit to inter se seniority in lower cadre - Seniority of petitioners which has been determined prior to 2017 Rules cannot be disturbed - Petitioners will not be adversely effected..........
Service -- Seniority inter se - Dispute between direct recruits and promotee deputy collector - Where initial appointment of promotees is on ad hoc basis and not according to Rules and made as a stop gap arrangement, officiation in such post cannot be taken into account for determining seniority...........
