LawMirror.com

Results of blending

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 16 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ia) -- Cruelty - Irretrievable breakdown of marriage - Divorce petition by wife - Parties have been living apart since 2012 - There does not seem to be any possibility of parties resolving their differences - Wife made serious allegations of cruelty against husband in her examinatio, i, chief, which are unrebutted - Blending the fact..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Joint Family Property -- Blending of self acquired property into joint family properties - Merely because three joint family members might have taken some loans while residing together, by that itself cannot be said that there was a blending of suit properties into joint family properties...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Joint Family Property -- Blending of self acquired property into joint family property - Property separate or self-acquired of a member of a joint Hindu family may be impressed with the character of joint family property if it is voluntarily thrown by the owner into the common stock with the intention of abandoning his separate claim therein - However, to establish such..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Joint Family Property -- Partition suit - Properties were obtained by father of plaintiff not from his direct male ancestors but from his mother's sister's husband - Suit properties were self acquired properties of father of parties pursuant to settlement deed - High Court thus, committed error in holding that there was blending of suit properties with joint family..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Assam Rifles Act, 1941, Section 4, Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, Rule 2(f) -- Sales tax concession - Purchase or sale of tea - Blending and packing of tea - Does not amount to manufacturing of tea...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Foreign Liquor (Compounding, Blending and Bottling) Rules, 1975, Rule 28A, Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002, Rule 7(11)(vii) -- Order of State Government allowing sale of IMFL on first day of English Calendar - Proviso to R.7(11)(vii) of Rules allows toddy shops to function of first day of English Calendar - Challenge..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Hindu Law -- Joint Family property - Doctrine of blending - It is necessary for the concerned party to prove that property was thrown in common stock with intention of abandoning all separate claims upon it - Clear intention in that regard needs to be established and only after that doctrine of blending can be used - Blending is possible only if coparcenary property is in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Joint Family Property -- Joint Family Property and Coparcenary property - Distinction - A coparcenary property which is to be inherited from common ancestors is that each and every coparcener has joint interest and joint possession therein - Joint Hindu Family property can be managed by a karta, who has same powers which can be exercised by a manager - He is supposed to..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Hindu Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20, Rule 12, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Section 4(1), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 23 -- Self acquired property - Rule of blending - If there was no joint family property or coparcenery property in existence at the time of alleged throwing of the house in dispute by the plaintiff into the common..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Hindu law -- Partition suit - Unity of title - Blending - Proof of - Plaintiff has not been able to show that he was earning and had substantial income at relevant time - Plaintiff has given two different versions as to his source of income - Defendant No.1 has unequivocally stated that it was defendant No.2 who contributed solely towards purchase of land on which house..........

Showing : 1-10 of 16 Results