LawMirror.com

Results of co op society act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 11 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1), (d), 3, 11 -- Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies, Sections 39, 47, 48 - APCS Rules, Rule 42 -Jurisdiction - Consumer - Deposits - With cooperative society - Additional remedy - Plea of the OP that the complainants are not consumers as their deposits itself are contrary to the bye-laws repelled - Held that the Commission has..........

ANDHRA PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 3, 14(1)(d) -- Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies, Sections 39,47,48 - APCS Rules, Rule 42 -Consumer - Deposits - FDR's - With cooperative society - Non-payment of FDR's - OP himself is admitting that there is fraud and misappropriation they cannot turn around and say at the belated stage that the deposits made by..........

THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Cooperative Society - Housing Society - Membership for allotment of a flat -OP No.2 was Secretary, OP No.3 Vice President and OP No.4 the President of Society - They all floated a Society and inducted unsuspecting persons from the public to become the members of the Society on the pretext that they would purchase..........

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) , 17 -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Complaint maintainability - Contention by the OP revision petitioner that the contract/agreement entered into between the parties for the purpose of installation of software in question being a commercial contract the complaint by complainant Co - operative Housing Society not..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, Section 3(f), Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Section 2(d) -- Co-operative bank - Meaning - A multi-state Co-op. Society, which undertakes `banking busienss' - Co-operatives banks do not fall within the meaning and definition of `Bank' as defined u/s 2(d) of 1993 Act. Banking Regulations..........

GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Common cause - Housing - Complaint for common grievance connected with basic rendition of service on the part of OP-builder-organiser-developer - Complainant No.1 is a consumer organisation, complainant Nos.2 and 3 being the allottees/occupiers and the members of the Society as also officers bearers - Held that they would be..........

GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Common cause - Housing - Complaint for common grievance connected with basic rendition of service on the part of OP-builder-organiser-developer - Complainant No.1 is a consumer organisation, complainant Nos.2 and 3 being the allottees/occupiers and the members of the Society as also officers bearers - Held that they would be..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(f) -- Consumer - Society member - Deposit of amount for allotment of residential plot - No allotment of plot could be made - Held that merely becoming a member of society does not amount to hiring of services of OP by the petitioner and he cannot be considered to be fall within the definition of consumer. (Par 4)..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),18 -- HUDA Act, Sections 2(b) , 3 and 30(2) - Plot allotment - Cancellation of letter of intent by Estate Officer - On appeal filed before Administrator HUDA appeal allowed and letter of intent restored - On asking of Estate Officer, HUDA required amount deposited with interest but possession of plot not delivered - Order of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1994
Details

Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, Section 54, 55 -- Ambit and scope of Section 55 wider than that of Section 54-Special feature of Section 55-Begins with a non obstante clause-Expression 'notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force'-Indicative of intention of Legislature to give over-riding effect to provisions of Section 55 over provisions..........

Showing : 1-10 of 11 Results