LawMirror.com

Results of comparing signatures

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 32 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 25D, 25F, 25G -- Expert opinion - Industrial dispute - Case of the petitioner before the Tribunal that his services were taken by the respondents under different names and different signatures were taken from him on the payment vouchers - Where there is even slightest of doubt in the mind of the Judge,..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, 73 -- Expert opinion - Disputed signatures - Defendant disputed her signature on receipt of payment of Rs.25,000/- - In such circumstances, Court did not take any risk of comparing the signature on disputed receipt with any admitted signature of defendant by invoking S.73 of Evidence Act, rather exercised power u/s 45 of the Act seeking..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 466, 467, 468, 471, 475, 511, 420 -- Forged document - Husband/petitioner forged documents and produced the same before Army Group Insurance Fund to get the death benefits of his wife - Involvement of petitioner in the crime has been arrived, on the basis of other independent evidence - Even without an exercise on the part of Court towards..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45, 73 -- Expert opinion - Disputed signatures - Trial Court dismissed the application for expert opinion on the ground that power u/s 73 of the Act can be exercised by Court for comparison of signatures - However, Court is also required to ask person to remain present in Court to put signatures/handwriting for purpose of comparing with words or..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Re-production of documents for comparing of signatures - Once original documents were produced in preliminary evidence of complainant and opportunity was granted to accused to cross-examine the complainant u/s 145(2) NI Act, then seeking re-production of said documents, more particularly, when those..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside - Service of summons - Summons duly served - Burden is on defendant to prove that summons in fact does not contain his signature or that it bears his forged signatures - It was the burden of defendant to lead positive evidence to prove that summon does not bear his signature like, producing..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Will -- Proof of - Disputed signatures - Comparison of signatures of testatrix on the Will of 1973 with signatures on the document of 1945 - Not permissible, as both the documents were separated by time gap of 28 years - Moreover, two signatures of testatrix were found on the document of 1945 and which of two signatures was used to compare the signatures on Will by First..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Partition suit -- Family settlement/samjhotanama executed between parties and plaintiff was already compensated for his share - Witnesses to the said document confirmed that they were present when document was executed between parties - No material contradiction emerged from the testimony of witnesses regarding execution of settlement despite of their lengthy..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73, 45 -- Court can compare signatures but Court cannot act as an expert - Court cannot take responsibility of comparing signatures when disputed - Such matters are of intrinsic technicalities requiring technical expertise - Court is not technically trained or qualified to indulge in comparison of hand writing...........

MANIPUR HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Setting aside of arbitral award - Condonation of delay - All the four awards were sent to the appellant by registered post with A/D and presumption is that he was served unless such presumption is rebutted by the appellant - Even, appellant only denied receiving of copy of the award in..........

Showing : 1-10 of 32 Results