Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9 -- Jurisdiction of civil Court - Suit for permanent injunction with regard to erection of electric poles and electric line over plot owned by plaintiff - Suit is maintainable before civil Court. (Electricity Act, 2003, S.145)..........
Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 16, 10, Electricity Act, 2003, Section 164, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendant from erecting poles on any part of suit lands without following due process of law - District Magistrate granted necessary permission - 80% work already complete - Order granting interim injunction set aside..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Electricity Act, 2004, Section 54, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Section 42, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 10 -- Laying electric head lines - Temporary injunction to restrain defendants from laying the over head electric lines etc. - The licensee under the Electricity Act and the Telegraph Act does not acquire any land, it..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Restraining electricity board from erecting electric poles and passing the electric wires - Held, Punjab State Electricity Board is empowered under the relevant provisions of law, to erect poles and lay lines in the fields of any private person - The only remedy available is to seek compensation...........
Electricity bill -- Tubewell connection - Deficiency in service - Compensation - There was storm due to which two poles broken and the electricity supply to the tubewell of respondent disrupted - Poles repaired after seven years - The bills sent by appellants on the basis of average for this period when they had not supplied electricity to the respondent held to be..........
Electricity supply -- Interruption of power supply as one of the electrical Poles fell down - No action taken despite bringing the same to the notice of OP - On the basis of Investigation report of the SDO of the Department findings recorded by the District Forum that the electric line was damaged due to the negligence of the department and complainant granted compensation..........
Electricity -- Crop damage - Complainant claiming damages for loss of sugarcane crops, coconut trees and chikku trees which were burnt because of sparking from the electric wires passing over the field of the complainant - Distance between the poles was too much and the wires were hanging loose due to distance - Authorities of the Electricity Board were informed to rectify..........
Electrocution -- Injury suffered on coming into contact with live electric wire hanging at low altitude - Very fact that live electric wire aligned to poles had loosened itself and sagged and was hanging at low altitude, is sufficient to infer that Electricity Board was negligent in maintaining transmission lines - Contention of Electricity Board that claimant herself..........
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 12 -- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Prior permission of District Magistrate or Commissioner of Police -Necessary only when objection raised by owner before completion of work - Owner did not raise objection before completion of work - Provisions of S.12 not attracted...........
Electricity Act, 1910, Section 42 -- Placing of poles and over-head lines in private property - Absence of sanctioned scheme - Provisions of S.42 not attracted...........
