LawMirror.com

Results of fraudulent sale deed

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 33 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 8, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 53 -- Attachment before judgment - Determination of whether sale deed is fraudulent is exclusively governed by S.53 of T.P Act and claim petition procedure O.38.R.8 CPC cannot substitute or override statutory safeguards and requirements of such substantive proceedings...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 15, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Petitioner was served at the address mentioned in sale deed itself - Substituted service was not shown to be fraudulent - Both courts below have concurrently found no procedural irregularity sufficient to set aside ex parte order in retrospect particularly in light of subsequent..........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420 -- Cheating - No allegation of complainant that any accused has made any representation to him to part with any property - As such for want of any representation, question of any fraudulent or dishonest inducement of complainant does not arise - Moreover, complainant has not parted with any property to accused, nor has he executed sale..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 467, 471, 474, 34 -- Cheating - Fraudulent sale deed - Attesting witness to a sale deed cannot be dragged into a web of crime, if there is no other allegation except that he is an attesting witness - Proceedings against attesting witness quashed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Proceedings under Land Revenue Code attained finality in the year 1991 and sale deed in question declared as fraudulent and benami in favour of plaintiff - However, question as to whether plaintiff was only ostensible owner and not beneficial owner could not have been gone into by Revenue Authorities - Since said..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d) -- Rejection of plaint - Suit for permanent injunction - Defendant admitted that he is residing in same property with plaintiff and after a lapse of 7-8 years he has filed an application U.O.7.R.11 CPC alleging that plaintiff has played fraud terming lease deed to be sale deed - However, it cannot be said that averment made..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Registration Act, 1908, Section 22, 69 -- Cancellation of registration - Validity of order - Respondent no.2 passed order that document in favour of respondent no.4 is genuine transaction and that the one executed in favour of petitioner is fraudulent and directed registering officer to initiate criminal prosecution in terms of circular - As per S.22(a) of the Act,..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9, Order 7, Rule 11(d) -- Rejection of plaint - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Suit for cancellation of sale deeds and permanent injunction - Plaintiff alleges that power of attorney which formed the basis for execution of sale deed is a fraudulent document and forged and fabricated - Said transaction would only be voidable and cannot be..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d) -- Rejection of plaint - Bar of limitation - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Plaintiffs asserted that suit was filed immediately after getting knowledge about fraudulent sale deed executed by defendants by keeping them in dark about such execution and within 2 days from refusal by defendants to refrain from..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration that sale deed in question is null and void and for permanent injunction - Plaintiff failed to prove that sale deed was executed in a fraudulent manner - Onus was on the plaintiff to prove the issues by leading cogent evidence - Much less producing any cogent evidence, plaintiff declined to enter witness box..........

Showing : 1-10 of 33 Results