LawMirror.com

Results of injunction against co owner permanent

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 128 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - When main relief of cancellation of sale deed of disputed property is not granted to plaintiff, then even consequential relief of permanent injunction cannot be granted to him against true owner of disputed property, who has acquired its ownership on the basis of said sale deed...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Co-owners - Suit for permanent or mandatory injunction - Not maintainable against another co-owner, notwithstanding the fact that different co-owners may be in a separate actual possession of distinct portions - In such circumstances, the only appropriate and legally permissible course open to plaintiff was to seek partition of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Easements Act, 1882, Section 15 -- Easement - Right of pathway - Plaintiff claims that he was in continuous use of common road for over four decades - However, plaintiff failed to establish such right of way was acquired by him by prescription or grant or by necessity - Moreover, plaintiff has laid suit seeking relief of declaration in `B' Schedule property and for..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Suit for specific performance, cancellation of sale deed executed by owner in favour of Respondent No.2 and suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff ready and willing to make the balance payment and getting sale deed executed in his favour - Prima facie case is in favour of plaintiff - Plaintiff..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9 -- Non-joinder of necessary party - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - State is owner of suit property - State is a necessary party represented by District Collector - Suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary and proper party...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 5 -- Stay of execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Suit land is joint and had not been partitioned - Tubewell installed would hence also be used as a joint source of irrigation - Plaintiff who was a co-sharer, would also have a right to use electricity connection - Contention of defendant that since tubewell was installed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Concurrent findings on record that plaintiff failed to prove that he is owner of suit property - Even qua construction of shop there was no cogent evidence led by plaintiff - Even, plaintiff stated in his cross-examination that he had no information as to whether any..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 0, Permanent injunction -- Dispute regarding common passage - Portion `A' was purchased by plaintiff and portion `B' in the back was purchased by defendant - Plaintiffs have agreed to leave 15 feet wide common passage in their portion `A' for common use by both defendants and plaintiffs for purposes of ingress and egress to their..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff is in occupation of property and Panchayat had indeed granted permission to plaintiff for construction of house - Trial Court and First appellate Court have found plaintiff as owner and occupier of suit property - Since plaintiff was owner of property, which is the only..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - Suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff himself admitted that respondent is original owner of property which is now occupied and purchased by plaintiff from third party only to the extent of 3500 sq ft of property - Remaining 3000 sq ft is situated on northern side of plaintiff's property and..........

Showing : 1-10 of 128 Results