Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Co-sharers - Co-owner in exclusive possession of a specific portion of joint land is entitled to seek protection against interference by other co-sharers and that no co-sharer has right to alter or change the nature of portion under exclusive possession of another - Application rightly allowed...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 5 -- Stay of execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Suit land is joint and had not been partitioned - Tubewell installed would hence also be used as a joint source of irrigation - Plaintiff who was a co-sharer, would also have a right to use electricity connection - Contention of defendant that since tubewell was installed..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Co-owners - Injunction - Law is not rigid that in no case injunction can be granted against co-owner - Injunction can be granted at the instance of one co-owner against another co-owner : (a) If one co-owner prevents the other from enjoying the common property, the affected co-owner can certainly approach the Court for..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Co-owners - Law as to grant of ad interim injunction : Joint ownership and absence of consent of co-owner(s) is definitely a relevant fact to be considered for granting stay in suit filed by a co-owner but it cannot be a straitjacket formula to grant stay in each and every case - Moreover,..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Parties to lis are joint owners of suit land - Plaintiff became co-owner of suit land by way of sale deed in his favour - But plaintiff has not been able to prove that at the time of execution of sale deed, he was given exclusive possession of suit property - Plaintiff thus failed to show prima facie..........
Injunction -- Dispute of electricity connection - Electric motor connection are installed in land jointly owned by plaintiff and defendant - Joint land has not been partitioned between the parties - Connections in question were installed in joint land coupled with that payment with regard to extension of load was made vide receipts in possession of plaintiff and pass..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - Suit for declaration of easementary rights and injunction - Proposed defendant is the joint owner of adjoining land in question - Without his impleadment proper and final adjudication in regard to easementary rights arising out of property in question cannot be made - Plaintiffs held, justified in..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38 -- Injunction - Co-owner can seek injunction against other co-sharer viz-a-viz change of nature of land - Since the property in question is joint and defendant failed to prove the family settlement as alleged by him, injunction rightly granted against defendant - Remedy if any for defendant was to seek partition...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - A standing tree belongs not to the person by whom it was planted but to the owner of land from which it draws its support and sustenance - In the instant case, suit land is admittedly joint between parties, and therefore, defendants, who are cutting poplar trees standing on joint land claiming exclusive..........
Co-owner -- Restraining other co-owner or any other person from cutting the trees from the joint land - Any relief including an interim injunction cannot be allowed unless all the co-owners are impleaded as party to the suit. (Specific Relief Act, 1963, Ss.37, 38, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.39.Rr.1,2)...........
