Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Co-sharers - While granting interim injunction U.O.39.Rr.1, 2 CPC, disputed issues such as alleged oral partition or affidavits regarding prior sales, cannot be conclusively determined at this stage...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendant from interfering with peaceful use of electric motor - Sanad Taksim along with site plan, demonstrates that sufficient portions of land, motor room and approach paths have been allocated to both brothers - This ensures that plaintiff can freely access and use electric..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 1, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 50 -- Suit for partition - Issue is whether the relationship between the deceased `D' and the plaintiffs' mother can be presumed to be a valid marital union, in the absence of formal documentary proof - The defendants, except for denying the marriage between the deceased `D' and the plaintiffs'..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of a party - Partition suit - Plaintiffs pleaded oral family arrangement - However, respondent who is one of legal heirs of deceased would submit that Family Arrangement Deed is a fraudulently created document - She is thus, a necessary and proper party in the suit - Unless respondent is impleaded as a party in..........
Stamp Act, 1899, Section 2(15) -- Partition deed - Parties on an oral family settlement not only divided their shares but also taken possession of their respective shares by metes and bounds, then at the time of reducing writing the memorandum of settlement they ceased to be co-owners - Memorandum of settlement held, not treated as instrument which requires stamp duty as..........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 17, 58 -- Proviso - Oral admission - Joint property - Oral admission as to possession of plaintiff over suit property is not sufficient evidence to infer partition of suit property - Proof of partition is necessary as per S.58 Proviso of Evidence Act - Said admission is not sufficient evidence of partition...........
Easements Act, 1882, Section 15 -- Easement - Right to fetch water from third party land - Oral evidence led by plaintiff with regard to right to fetch water is not sufficient to come to conclusion that plaintiffs have been exercising the said right from time immemorial without any interruption - Defendants purchased the property in question and in his sale deed there was..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff successfully established his possession and enjoyment of suit property - However, not even a single document has been filed or exhibited on the side of defendant - Mere admission of PW1 that suit property was allotted to defendant No.4 under a oral partition, cannot be sole criteria to..........
Partition suit -- Suit dismissed qua four items of suit properties - Alleged oral relinquishment of said properties discarded by trial Court being not proved - No evidence is adduced that properties in question were purchased only out of joint family funds in the names of members of joint family thereby entitling plaintiff to a share in the same - Suit rightly dismissed..........
Partition suit -- Oral partition had taken place between three sons of original owner - One of sons sold certain portions of suit properties - Predecessor of plaintiffs also purchased certain specific portions of suit properties from said son - There is thus, partition between parties and brothers were enjoying the properties as their absolute properties - Suit for..........
