LawMirror.com

Results of s 27 of sra

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27 -- Rescission of contract - Proceeding u/s 27 of the Act is an original proceeding only and not by way of an application in a suit for specific performance which has already been decreed in favour of plaintiff, as same uses expression `adjudged by the Court'...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27, 28 -- Rescission of contract - Difference between S.27 and S.28 of the Act - S.27 of the Act, while providing for rescission of contracts, does not permit rescission post decree for specific performance - Rescission post decree for specific performance is permitted only u/s 28 of the Act, but at the instance only of vendor/seller or..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27, 28 -- Rescission of contract - Applicability of S.27 of the Act - Contract, decree for specific performance has already been passed, cannot be said to be voidable or terminable or unlawful - Question of applicability of S.27 of the Act does not arise...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 27, 50 -- Suit for possession and injunction - Protected tenant - Defendant pleaded that suit barred u/s 50 of Delhi Rent Control Act - In suit for eviction filed by plaintiff, defendant never represented estate of deceased tenant - In injunction proceedings initiated by defendant against..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Contract Act, 1872, Section 27, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 42 -- Injunction - Restraint of trade - Injunction sought by appellant was not to restrain respondent from carrying on trade or business but from using Trade Mark which was subject matter of dispute - Held, provisions of S.27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 would not be attracted to the facts in this case...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Contract Act, 1872, Section 27, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 42 -- Contract of service - Negative stipulation - As per terms of employment employee was not to disclose trade secrets to others and not to compete with employer for a period of five years after expiry of term of service - Employee resigning voluntarily..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27 -- Agreement to sell - Suit for declaration for rescission of contract as defendant did not turn up on stipulated time - Suit is maintainable since plaintiff has right to rescind agreement on failure of defendant to fulfil his part of agreement...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27 -- Rescission of contract - Suit for declaration - In such a suit relief of possession can be granted as, such a relief is a consequential relief...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27, 31 -- Sale deed - Suit for cancellation - Conduct of plaintiff found blame worthy between the date of presentation of sale deed for registration and date of filing of the suit including the exchange of correspondence - ITC necessary for registration not produced - Did not honour the agreement embodied in the letter dt.12.8.1971 -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 27, 31 -- Sale deed - Suit for cancellation - Conduct of defendant found blame worthy in not paying the balance sale consideration to plaintiff - Used the property to the best of their advantage - Defendant agreed to pay Rs.40 lacs in lump sum within six months to plaintiff - Appeal allowed - Suit dismissed with direction to pay Rs.40..........

Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results