LawMirror.com

Results of state consumer haryana

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 12 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12 -- Agricultural loan - Scheme regarding waiver of agricultural debt - Appellants claimed waiver of loan u/cl. 5 of Scheme - District Forum after carefully evaluated the Scheme came to conclusion that appellants would fall in category of `small farmer' - State Commission also entered a similar finding - However, National Commission..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Haryana State Federation of Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Store Ltd. Staff Service Rules, 1975, Rule 60 -- Departmental proceedings - Shall be deemed to have been instituted when charge sheet is issued to retires - After retirement of an employee, departmental proceedings will not be instituted save with sanction of Competent Authority and shall be in respect of an event..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Haryana State Federation of Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Store Ltd. Staff Service Rules, 1975, Rule 60 -- Departmental proceedings - Alleged act of procuring wheat at low plinth was done between 16.02.2009 to 31.08.2009 - Damage ensured later on - Therefore, for said event, petitioner could be charge sheeted at most till 30.08.2013 - Petitioner was charge sheeted on..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 15 -- HUDA - Re-allotment of plot on revised rate - Plot allotted to appellant was cancelled by HUDA on account of default in payment of enhanced money - 10% earnest money also refunded to appellant and he accepted the same - However, District Forum restored the allotment -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 6 -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Driving licence - Fake driving licence - Two driving licences - Holding of two driving licences would be violative of Section 6 of the MV Act - First licence found fake - Second licence made from Nagaland giving temporary address of Nagaland and permanent..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17 -- Insurance claim - Jurisdiction - Fire in godown at Ambala (Haryana) - Claim petition filed before Consumer Commission, Chandigarh (U.T.) - Plea that Insurance Company has a branch office at Chandigarh as such Commissioner at Chandigarh has jurisdiction - Held, `branch office' means the branch office where the cause of action has..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(2)(a) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Insurance claim - Plea that complainant institution situated in District Jhajjar, Haryana, insurance policy obtained at Bahadurgarh and no cause of action arisen at Chandigarh the Chandigarh State Commission has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint - Held that since the regional..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11 -- Territorial jurisdiction - Industrial plot - Allotment of - Industrial plot in question situated at Gurgaon in the State of Haryana - Part of cause of action relating to the acceptance of bid offer and communication thereof and submission of the relevant and necessary documents took place at Chandigarh - State Commission, U.T.,..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Address of the OP is of Panchkula which is situated in the State of Haryana and outside the local limits of the Union Territory, Chandigarh - Held that the District Forum Chandigarh lacked territorial jurisdiction when the complaint case was taken up for decision the judgment of the District Forum..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Allotment of House - Eligibility for applying - Complainant's husband employee of State Bank of India posted in Union Territory of Chandigarh - Cannot be equated with the employees of Central Government or a Board or a Corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government working under the control or supervision of Haryana..........

Showing : 1-10 of 12 Results