Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Where a case has been presented in Court beyond limitation, person has to explain Court as to what was "sufficient cause" which means an adequate and enough reason which prevented him to approach Court within limitation - Though limitation may harshly affect the rights of a party, it has to be..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 1788 days in filing second appeal - Sufficient cause - Inordinate delay was not explained satisfactorily - No sufficient cause was shown for the same, and even no plausible reason was put forth by State - Application rejected...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 29 years in filing revision - No sufficient explanation has been offered by petitioner for such an inordinate delay - Conduct of petitioner prima facie appears to be mala fide - Delay cannot be condoned unless sufficient reason is assigned...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 3 -- Limitation - Law as to - (i) Law of limitation is based upon public policy that there should be an end to litigation by forfeiting the right to remedy rather than the right itself; (ii) A right or the remedy that has not been exercised or availed of for a long time must come to an end or cease to exist after a fixed period of time;..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, 3 -- Limitation - Law as to - (i) Law of limitation is based upon public policy that there should be an end to litigation by forfeiting the right to remedy rather than the right itself; (ii) A right or the remedy that has not been exercised or availed of for a long time must come to an end or cease to exist after a fixed period of time;..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Discretion to condone the delay must be exercised with care and caution on having objective satisfaction regarding sufficient cause to condone the delay - In the instant case, there is no sufficient reason disclosed in the application u/s 5 of the Act to condone the delay - Application rejected...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 480 days in filing revision - There is no reason for condoning delay in preferring revision against interim order that too after delay of 480 days - Sufficient cause has not been even shown by petitioner for preferring the revision after a long delay - Application dismissed...........
Workmen, Section 3, 4 -- Accident - Compensation - Delay of 9 years in filing claim petition - Application before Commissioner was filed only after proceedings in Motor Accident Claims Tribunal were concluded and appellants were not able to get any compensation in execution - Moreover, appellants themselves stated that they had not claimed any compensation against owner of..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 19 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 53 days in filing appeal u/s 19 of Family Courts Act - Delay occurred due to improper advice about limitation of filing appeal - Delay is not inordinate or intentional - Delay appears to have been caused due to bona fide reason - There is thus, sufficient explanation for..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay of 175 days - Delay not properly explained except throwing blame on Advocate for which there is no supporting material or affidavit - Having entered appearance through counsel, there is no reason for defendant to plead that failure on part..........
