Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction - Plaintiff's title/ownership to suit property is clearly established through registered sale deed, mutation, issuance of patta and approved building map in favor of plaintiff - It therefore, demonstrate possession under lawful title and do not reflect hostility required for adverse possession -..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65 -- Limitation - Suit for declaration that sale deed in question is null and void - Plaintiff had claimed relief of joint possession - Sale deed in question was void - Plaintiff could not be said to have executed sale deed - Therefore, plaintiff could indeed have maintained an action to obtain possession of property on the basis of her title..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration on basis of adverse possession and permanent injunction - Plaintiff has relied upon agreement to sell to prove her ownership over suit property - However admittedly, said agreement was not proven on record in terms of S.64 of Evidence Act - Original agreement was never produced by plaintiff - Even no..........
Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of ownership on basis of adverse possession - Suit property is properly identified and continuation of possession of plaintiff has not been disputed by State during trial rather admitted in written statement as well as by its witness DW1 - Entries in revenue record reflect that unauthorized possession was very much in the..........
Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Property in question was jointly owned by members of same family - Possession of plaintiffs was in a representative capacity being co-sharer - Merely because a particular co-sharer is not in possession and is residing out of village is not sufficient to prove ouster - Plaintiffs..........
Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession against Government - Pleadings of plaintiffs are contrary and it is not clear whether they have claimed title on the basis of adverse possession which is not proved or have claimed title on the basis of any previous title on the basis of any previous title of his predecessor - No..........
Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Isolated land tax receipt - Not sufficient to prove adverse possession...........
Adverse possession -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Plaintiff sought prescriptive title on the basis of UDR patta issued in his name - However, said patta have no seal of official who signed the document - Even, date of document also not mentioned - Patta was issued in favour of plaintiff without notice to defendants, who were original..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession - Plaintiff has failed to prove his adverse title by leading cogent evidence - Therefore, additional document produced by defendants are not necessary to dispose of the appeal and there is no need to afford an opportunity to plaintiff to cross-examine defendants with..........
Adverse possession -- Plaintiff could not establish that his adverse possession commenced from a particular date - There was no foundation for the plea of adverse possession in the plant itself - Plaintiff failed to prove his plea of adverse possession - Suit for declaration on the basis of adverse possession rightly dismissed...........
