LawMirror.com

Results of suit for injunction encroachment

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 73 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Advocate Commissioner - When plaintiff is in possession of suit property and no encroachment is made by defendants, he cannot seek for appointment of Advocate Commissioner in order to collect evidence in a suit for permanent injunction...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Encroachment - Plaintiff failed to make out prima facie case that he has exclusive title over disputed portion - When there is a dispute over title of property by rival parties, plaintiff ought to have amended suit including prayer for declaration of title - Since plaintiff failed to do so, he is not entitled..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Encroachment - Plaintiff failed to establish alleged encroachment by defendant - Though plaintiff contended that defendant encroached upon his property in the year 2005, inaction by plaintiff in taking any steps against defendant would go to show that said contention is false - Considering evidence of PW1 and..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction - Concurrent findings of Courts below that plaintiff failed to prove encroachment or interference by defendants - Demarcation report and expert witnesses confirmed that both the parties were in possession of their respective Khasra numbers disproving plaintiff's case of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Encroachment - Plaintiff neither pleaded nor proved the date, month or year of construction - She also failed to produce any site plan depicting the alleged encroachment or any demarcation report to substantiate her claim that defendant has raised construction over her land - Moreover, plaintiff did not step..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 101 -- Burden of proof - Suit for possession and permanent injunction - Burden lies upon plaintiffs to establish their title or prior possession, alleged act of encroachment with clarity and certainty...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for possession and permanent injunction - Courts below after proper appreciation of oral and documentary evidence have concurrently held that plaintiffs have failed to establish location and encroachment over their land - Demarcation reports relied upon by plaintiffs merely refers to certain parts of Survey..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65 -- Limitation - Suit for possession and permanent injunction - Suit filed after an unexplained delay of nearly 37 years from the date of alleged dispossession or encroachment - Cause of action as pleaded having arisen in 2008 on the basis of demarcation - Mere demarcation cannot give rise to a fresh cause of action so as to override the..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Title suit - Dispossession in violation of order of injunction - Amendment of plaint sought to seek consequential reliefs - Trial Court while allowing amendment held that proposed amendment involving question of encroachment and recovery of possession unless incorporated by way of amendment, real..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Encroachment - Court below on basis of report of Mauka Commissioner and while considering other material available on record, has reached to prima facie conclusion that comparative measurements of land purchased by plaintiff and measurements of patta issued in favour of `R' from whom..........

Showing : 1-10 of 73 Results