Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Once review petition is dismissed, doctrine of merger has no application - Aggrieved person has to challenge main order and not the order dismissing review petition...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 114, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Petitioners have failed to show mistakes committed by Court at the time of passing order to be reviewed or error apparent on face of said order - Petitioners also did not show any other sufficient reasons for which order has to be reviewed - Petition dismissed...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 141, Order 47, Rule 1, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Writ petition - Dismissal of - Review - Writ petition dismissed on the ground that petitioner is not a "person aggrieved" in the subject matter, hence no right to approach this Court by filling a writ petition u/Art.226 of the Constitution of India - Review petition -..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - Apex Court directed lower Court to consider and decide matter expeditiously - Matter seized with lower Court since 01.12.2007 whereby summons were issued to applicants to appear in the case - Said order was modified by same Court by..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 23 -- Market value - Determination of - Review - Condonation of delay - Review of a determination of compensation on ground that certain other similarly placed persons have been given a higher rate of compensation - Held, not permissible - Applications have been filed after inordinate delay -..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 47, Rule 1, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136 -- Review petition - Order passed by High Court in second appeal - SLP against said order, dismissed as withdrawn by Supreme Court, on request of counsel, without permission or reservation or liberty for taking further action -..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b) -- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the application for restoration filed..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b) -- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the application for restoration filed..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 18, 21(b) -- Complaint - Dismissal in default - Restoration of complaint - Plea that the State Commission has no power to review its order - Held that since the matter was pending before the State Commission at admission stage, it rightly observed that petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the application for restoration filed..........
Punjab National Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) 1977 -- Regulation 7(2) Petitioner, an Assistant Manager in Bank, was removed from service after instituting an enquiry for misconduct during his service - Enquiry Officer had found petitioner guilty of two charges partially while exonerating petitioner of two other charges - Disciplinary authority differed..........
